:: Initialization Halting Concepts and Their Basic Properties of SCM+FSA
:: by JingChao Chen and Yatsuka Nakamura
::
:: Received June 17, 1998
:: Copyright (c) 1998 Association of Mizar Users


definition
let I be Program of SCM+FSA ;
attr I is InitClosed means :Def1: :: SCM_HALT:def 1
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for n being Element of NAT st Initialized I c= s holds
IC (Computation s,n) in dom I;
attr I is InitHalting means :Def2: :: SCM_HALT:def 2
Initialized I is halting;
attr I is keepInt0_1 means :Def3: :: SCM_HALT:def 3
for s being State of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
for k being Element of NAT holds (Computation s,k) . (intloc 0 ) = 1;
end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines InitClosed SCM_HALT:def 1 :
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is InitClosed iff for s being State of SCM+FSA
for n being Element of NAT st Initialized I c= s holds
IC (Computation s,n) in dom I );

:: deftheorem Def2 defines InitHalting SCM_HALT:def 2 :
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is InitHalting iff Initialized I is halting );

:: deftheorem Def3 defines keepInt0_1 SCM_HALT:def 3 :
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is keepInt0_1 iff for s being State of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
for k being Element of NAT holds (Computation s,k) . (intloc 0 ) = 1 );

theorem Th1: :: SCM_HALT:1
for x being set
for i, m, n being Element of NAT holds
( not x in dom (((intloc i) .--> m) +* (Start-At (insloc n))) or x = intloc i or x = IC SCM+FSA )
proof end;

theorem Th2: :: SCM_HALT:2
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for i, m, n being Element of NAT holds dom I misses dom (((intloc i) .--> m) +* (Start-At (insloc n)))
proof end;

set iS = ((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 ));

theorem :: SCM_HALT:3
canceled;

theorem Th4: :: SCM_HALT:4
Macro (halt SCM+FSA ) is InitHalting
proof end;

registration
cluster InitHalting Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
existence
ex b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is InitHalting
by Th4;
end;

theorem Th5: :: SCM_HALT:5
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
s is halting
proof end;

theorem Th6: :: SCM_HALT:6
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds I +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )) c= Initialized I
proof end;

theorem Th7: :: SCM_HALT:7
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
s . (intloc 0 ) = 1
proof end;

registration
cluster paraclosed -> InitClosed Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is paraclosed holds
b1 is InitClosed
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster parahalting -> InitHalting Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is parahalting holds
b1 is InitHalting
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster InitHalting -> InitClosed Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is InitHalting holds
b1 is InitClosed
proof end;
cluster keepInt0_1 -> InitClosed Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is keepInt0_1 holds
b1 is InitClosed
proof end;
cluster keeping_0 -> keepInt0_1 Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is keeping_0 holds
b1 is keepInt0_1
proof end;
end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:8
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st not a in UsedIntLoc I holds
(IExec I,s) . a = s . a
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:9
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for f being FinSeq-Location st not f in UsedInt*Loc I holds
(IExec I,s) . f = s . f
proof end;

registration
let I be InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster Initialized I -> halting ;
coherence
Initialized I is halting
by Def2;
end;

registration
cluster InitHalting -> non empty Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is InitHalting holds
not b1 is empty
proof end;
end;

theorem Th10: :: SCM_HALT:10
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA holds dom I <> {}
proof end;

theorem Th11: :: SCM_HALT:11
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA holds insloc 0 in dom I
proof end;

theorem Th12: :: SCM_HALT:12
for s1, s2 being State of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized J c= s1 holds
for n being Element of NAT st ProgramPart (Relocated J,n) c= s2 & IC s2 = insloc n & DataPart s1 = DataPart s2 holds
for i being Element of NAT holds
( (IC (Computation s1,i)) + n = IC (Computation s2,i) & IncAddr (CurInstr (Computation s1,i)),n = CurInstr (Computation s2,i) & DataPart (Computation s1,i) = DataPart (Computation s2,i) )
proof end;

theorem Th13: :: SCM_HALT:13
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
I c= s
proof end;

theorem Th14: :: SCM_HALT:14
for s1, s2 being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s1 & Initialized I c= s2 & s1,s2 equal_outside NAT holds
for k being Element of NAT holds
( Computation s1,k, Computation s2,k equal_outside NAT & CurInstr (Computation s1,k) = CurInstr (Computation s2,k) )
proof end;

theorem Th15: :: SCM_HALT:15
for s1, s2 being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s1 & Initialized I c= s2 & s1,s2 equal_outside NAT holds
( LifeSpan s1 = LifeSpan s2 & Result s1, Result s2 equal_outside NAT )
proof end;

registration
cluster keeping_0 InitHalting Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
existence
ex b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st
( b1 is keeping_0 & b1 is InitHalting )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster InitHalting keepInt0_1 Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
existence
ex b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st
( b1 is keepInt0_1 & b1 is InitHalting )
proof end;
end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:16
canceled;

theorem Th17: :: SCM_HALT:17
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA holds (IExec I,s) . (intloc 0 ) = 1
proof end;

theorem Th18: :: SCM_HALT:18
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitClosed Program of SCM+FSA
for J being Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s & s is halting holds
for m being Element of NAT st m <= LifeSpan s holds
Computation s,m, Computation (s +* (I ';' J)),m equal_outside NAT
proof end;

theorem Th19: :: SCM_HALT:19
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for i, m, n being Element of NAT holds (s +* I) +* (((intloc i) .--> m) +* (Start-At (insloc n))) = (s +* (((intloc i) .--> m) +* (Start-At (insloc n)))) +* I
proof end;

theorem Th20: :: SCM_HALT:20
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA st ((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )) c= s holds
( Initialized I c= s +* (I +* (((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))) & s +* (I +* (((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))) = s +* I & (s +* (I +* (((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 ))))) +* (Directed I) = s +* (Directed I) )
proof end;

theorem Th21: :: SCM_HALT:21
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitClosed Program of SCM+FSA st s +* I is halting & Directed I c= s & ((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )) c= s holds
IC (Computation s,((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1)) = insloc (card I)
proof end;

theorem Th22: :: SCM_HALT:22
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitClosed Program of SCM+FSA st s +* I is halting & Directed I c= s & ((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )) c= s holds
DataPart (Computation s,(LifeSpan (s +* I))) = DataPart (Computation s,((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1))
proof end;

theorem Th23: :: SCM_HALT:23
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
for k being Element of NAT st k <= LifeSpan s holds
CurInstr (Computation (s +* (Directed I)),k) <> halt SCM+FSA
proof end;

theorem Th24: :: SCM_HALT:24
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitClosed Program of SCM+FSA st s +* (Initialized I) is halting holds
for J being Program of SCM+FSA
for k being Element of NAT st k <= LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I)) holds
Computation (s +* (Initialized I)),k, Computation (s +* (Initialized (I ';' J))),k equal_outside NAT
proof end;

theorem Th25: :: SCM_HALT:25
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA st Initialized (I ';' J) c= s holds
( IC (Computation s,((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1)) = insloc (card I) & DataPart (Computation s,((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1)) = DataPart ((Computation (s +* I),(LifeSpan (s +* I))) +* (Initialized J)) & ProgramPart (Relocated J,(card I)) c= Computation s,((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1) & (Computation s,((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1)) . (intloc 0 ) = 1 & s is halting & LifeSpan s = ((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1) + (LifeSpan ((Result (s +* I)) +* (Initialized J))) & ( J is keeping_0 implies (Result s) . (intloc 0 ) = 1 ) )
proof end;

registration
let I be InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA ;
let J be InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster I ';' J -> InitHalting ;
coherence
I ';' J is InitHalting
proof end;
end;

theorem Th26: :: SCM_HALT:26
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA st s +* I is halting holds
for J being InitClosed Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized (I ';' J) c= s holds
for k being Element of NAT holds (Computation ((Result (s +* I)) +* (Initialized J)),k) +* (Start-At ((IC (Computation ((Result (s +* I)) +* (Initialized J)),k)) + (card I))), Computation (s +* (I ';' J)),(((LifeSpan (s +* I)) + 1) + k) equal_outside NAT
proof end;

theorem Th27: :: SCM_HALT:27
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA st not s +* (Initialized I) is halting holds
for J being Program of SCM+FSA
for k being Element of NAT holds Computation (s +* (Initialized I)),k, Computation (s +* (Initialized (I ';' J))),k equal_outside NAT
proof end;

theorem Th28: :: SCM_HALT:28
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA holds LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized (I ';' J))) = ((LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I))) + 1) + (LifeSpan ((Result (s +* (Initialized I))) +* (Initialized J)))
proof end;

theorem Th29: :: SCM_HALT:29
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA holds IExec (I ';' J),s = (IExec J,(IExec I,s)) +* (Start-At ((IC (IExec J,(IExec I,s))) + (card I)))
proof end;

registration
let i be parahalting Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
cluster Macro i -> InitHalting ;
coherence
Macro i is InitHalting
;
end;

registration
let i be parahalting Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
let J be parahalting Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster i ';' J -> InitHalting ;
coherence
i ';' J is InitHalting
;
end;

registration
let i be parahalting keeping_0 Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
let J be InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster i ';' J -> InitHalting ;
coherence
i ';' J is InitHalting
;
end;

registration
let I, J be keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster I ';' J -> keepInt0_1 ;
coherence
I ';' J is keepInt0_1
proof end;
end;

registration
let j be parahalting keeping_0 Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
let I be InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster I ';' j -> InitHalting keepInt0_1 ;
coherence
( I ';' j is InitHalting & I ';' j is keepInt0_1 )
;
end;

registration
let i be parahalting keeping_0 Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
let J be InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster i ';' J -> InitHalting keepInt0_1 ;
coherence
( i ';' J is InitHalting & i ';' J is keepInt0_1 )
;
end;

registration
let j be parahalting Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
let I be parahalting Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster I ';' j -> InitHalting ;
coherence
I ';' j is InitHalting
;
end;

registration
let i, j be parahalting Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
cluster i ';' j -> InitHalting ;
coherence
i ';' j is InitHalting
;
end;

theorem Th30: :: SCM_HALT:30
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for a being Int-Location
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA holds (IExec (I ';' J),s) . a = (IExec J,(IExec I,s)) . a
proof end;

theorem Th31: :: SCM_HALT:31
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for f being FinSeq-Location
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA holds (IExec (I ';' J),s) . f = (IExec J,(IExec I,s)) . f
proof end;

theorem Th32: :: SCM_HALT:32
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA holds DataPart (Initialize (IExec I,s)) = DataPart (IExec I,s)
proof end;

theorem Th33: :: SCM_HALT:33
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for a being Int-Location
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for j being parahalting Instruction of SCM+FSA holds (IExec (I ';' j),s) . a = (Exec j,(IExec I,s)) . a
proof end;

theorem Th34: :: SCM_HALT:34
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for f being FinSeq-Location
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for j being parahalting Instruction of SCM+FSA holds (IExec (I ';' j),s) . f = (Exec j,(IExec I,s)) . f
proof end;

definition
let I be Program of SCM+FSA ;
let s be State of SCM+FSA ;
pred I is_closed_onInit s means :Def4: :: SCM_HALT:def 4
for k being Element of NAT holds IC (Computation (s +* (Initialized I)),k) in dom I;
pred I is_halting_onInit s means :Def5: :: SCM_HALT:def 5
s +* (Initialized I) is halting;
end;

:: deftheorem Def4 defines is_closed_onInit SCM_HALT:def 4 :
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA holds
( I is_closed_onInit s iff for k being Element of NAT holds IC (Computation (s +* (Initialized I)),k) in dom I );

:: deftheorem Def5 defines is_halting_onInit SCM_HALT:def 5 :
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA holds
( I is_halting_onInit s iff s +* (Initialized I) is halting );

theorem Th35: :: SCM_HALT:35
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is InitClosed iff for s being State of SCM+FSA holds I is_closed_onInit s )
proof end;

theorem Th36: :: SCM_HALT:36
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is InitHalting iff for s being State of SCM+FSA holds I is_halting_onInit s )
proof end;

theorem Th37: :: SCM_HALT:37
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & I is_closed_onInit s & Initialized I c= s holds
for k being Element of NAT holds (Computation s,k) . a = s . a
proof end;

registration
cluster good InitHalting Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
existence
ex b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st
( b1 is InitHalting & b1 is good )
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster good InitClosed -> keepInt0_1 Element of sproduct the Object-Kind of SCM+FSA ;
correctness
coherence
for b1 being Program of SCM+FSA st b1 is InitClosed & b1 is good holds
b1 is keepInt0_1
;
proof end;
end;

registration
cluster Stop SCM+FSA -> good InitHalting ;
coherence
( Stop SCM+FSA is InitHalting & Stop SCM+FSA is good )
;
end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:38
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for i being parahalting keeping_0 Instruction of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being Int-Location holds (IExec (i ';' J),s) . a = (IExec J,(Exec i,(Initialize s))) . a
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:39
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for i being parahalting keeping_0 Instruction of SCM+FSA
for J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for f being FinSeq-Location holds (IExec (i ';' J),s) . f = (IExec J,(Exec i,(Initialize s))) . f
proof end;

theorem Th40: :: SCM_HALT:40
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is_closed_onInit s iff I is_closed_on Initialize s )
proof end;

theorem Th41: :: SCM_HALT:41
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is_halting_onInit s iff I is_halting_on Initialize s )
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:42
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA holds IExec I,s = IExec I,(Initialize s)
proof end;

theorem Th43: :: SCM_HALT:43
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a = 0 & I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
( if=0 a,I,J is_closed_onInit s & if=0 a,I,J is_halting_onInit s )
proof end;

theorem Th44: :: SCM_HALT:44
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a = 0 & I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s = (IExec I,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3)))
proof end;

theorem Th45: :: SCM_HALT:45
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a <> 0 & J is_closed_onInit s & J is_halting_onInit s holds
( if=0 a,I,J is_closed_onInit s & if=0 a,I,J is_halting_onInit s )
proof end;

theorem Th46: :: SCM_HALT:46
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location
for s being State of SCM+FSA st s . a <> 0 & J is_closed_onInit s & J is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3)))
proof end;

theorem Th47: :: SCM_HALT:47
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location holds
( if=0 a,I,J is InitHalting & ( s . a = 0 implies IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s = (IExec I,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3))) ) & ( s . a <> 0 implies IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3))) ) )
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:48
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location holds
( IC (IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s) = insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3) & ( s . a = 0 implies ( ( for d being Int-Location holds (IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s) . d = (IExec I,s) . d ) & ( for f being FinSeq-Location holds (IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s) . f = (IExec I,s) . f ) ) ) & ( s . a <> 0 implies ( ( for d being Int-Location holds (IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s) . d = (IExec J,s) . d ) & ( for f being FinSeq-Location holds (IExec (if=0 a,I,J),s) . f = (IExec J,s) . f ) ) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th49: :: SCM_HALT:49
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a > 0 & I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
( if>0 a,I,J is_closed_onInit s & if>0 a,I,J is_halting_onInit s )
proof end;

theorem Th50: :: SCM_HALT:50
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a > 0 & I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s = (IExec I,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3)))
proof end;

theorem Th51: :: SCM_HALT:51
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a <= 0 & J is_closed_onInit s & J is_halting_onInit s holds
( if>0 a,I,J is_closed_onInit s & if>0 a,I,J is_halting_onInit s )
proof end;

theorem Th52: :: SCM_HALT:52
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location
for s being State of SCM+FSA st s . a <= 0 & J is_closed_onInit s & J is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3)))
proof end;

theorem Th53: :: SCM_HALT:53
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location holds
( if>0 a,I,J is InitHalting & ( s . a > 0 implies IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s = (IExec I,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3))) ) & ( s . a <= 0 implies IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3))) ) )
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:54
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location holds
( IC (IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s) = insloc (((card I) + (card J)) + 3) & ( s . a > 0 implies ( ( for d being Int-Location holds (IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s) . d = (IExec I,s) . d ) & ( for f being FinSeq-Location holds (IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s) . f = (IExec I,s) . f ) ) ) & ( s . a <= 0 implies ( ( for d being Int-Location holds (IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s) . d = (IExec J,s) . d ) & ( for f being FinSeq-Location holds (IExec (if>0 a,I,J),s) . f = (IExec J,s) . f ) ) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th55: :: SCM_HALT:55
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a < 0 & I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if<0 a,I,J),s = (IExec I,s) +* (Start-At (insloc ((((card I) + (card J)) + (card J)) + 7)))
proof end;

theorem Th56: :: SCM_HALT:56
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a = 0 & J is_closed_onInit s & J is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if<0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc ((((card I) + (card J)) + (card J)) + 7)))
proof end;

theorem Th57: :: SCM_HALT:57
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a > 0 & J is_closed_onInit s & J is_halting_onInit s holds
IExec (if<0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc ((((card I) + (card J)) + (card J)) + 7)))
proof end;

theorem Th58: :: SCM_HALT:58
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I, J being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location holds
( if<0 a,I,J is InitHalting & ( s . a < 0 implies IExec (if<0 a,I,J),s = (IExec I,s) +* (Start-At (insloc ((((card I) + (card J)) + (card J)) + 7))) ) & ( s . a >= 0 implies IExec (if<0 a,I,J),s = (IExec J,s) +* (Start-At (insloc ((((card I) + (card J)) + (card J)) + 7))) ) )
proof end;

registration
let I, J be InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA ;
let a be read-write Int-Location ;
cluster if=0 a,I,J -> InitHalting ;
correctness
coherence
if=0 a,I,J is InitHalting
;
by Th47;
cluster if>0 a,I,J -> InitHalting ;
correctness
coherence
if>0 a,I,J is InitHalting
;
by Th53;
cluster if<0 a,I,J -> InitHalting ;
correctness
coherence
if<0 a,I,J is InitHalting
;
by Th58;
end;

theorem Th59: :: SCM_HALT:59
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is InitHalting iff for s being State of SCM+FSA holds I is_halting_on Initialize s )
proof end;

theorem Th60: :: SCM_HALT:60
for I being Program of SCM+FSA holds
( I is InitClosed iff for s being State of SCM+FSA holds I is_closed_on Initialize s )
proof end;

theorem Th61: :: SCM_HALT:61
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location holds (IExec I,s) . a = (Computation ((Initialize s) +* (I +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))),(LifeSpan ((Initialize s) +* (I +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))))) . a
proof end;

theorem Th62: :: SCM_HALT:62
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being Int-Location
for k being Element of NAT st I does_not_destroy a holds
(IExec I,s) . a = (Computation ((Initialize s) +* (I +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))),k) . a
proof end;

set A = NAT ;

set D = Int-Locations \/ FinSeq-Locations ;

theorem Th63: :: SCM_HALT:63
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a holds
(IExec I,s) . a = (Initialize s) . a
proof end;

theorem Th64: :: SCM_HALT:64
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting keepInt0_1 Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a holds
(Computation ((Initialize s) +* ((I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))),(LifeSpan ((Initialize s) +* ((I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))))) . a = (s . a) - 1
proof end;

theorem Th65: :: SCM_HALT:65
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitClosed Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s & s is halting holds
for m being Element of NAT st m <= LifeSpan s holds
Computation s,m, Computation (s +* (loop I)),m equal_outside NAT
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:66
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA st Initialized I c= s holds
for k being Element of NAT st k <= LifeSpan s holds
CurInstr (Computation (s +* (loop I)),k) <> halt SCM+FSA
proof end;

theorem Th67: :: SCM_HALT:67
for I being Program of SCM+FSA
for s being State of SCM+FSA holds I c= s +* (Initialized I)
proof end;

theorem Th68: :: SCM_HALT:68
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA st I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
for m being Element of NAT st m <= LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I)) holds
Computation (s +* (Initialized I)),m, Computation (s +* (Initialized (loop I))),m equal_outside NAT
proof end;

theorem Th69: :: SCM_HALT:69
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA st I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
for m being Element of NAT st m < LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I)) holds
CurInstr (Computation (s +* (Initialized I)),m) = CurInstr (Computation (s +* (Initialized (loop I))),m)
proof end;

theorem Th70: :: SCM_HALT:70
for l being Instruction-Location of SCM+FSA holds not l in dom (((intloc 0 ) .--> 1) +* (Start-At (insloc 0 )))
proof end;

theorem Th71: :: SCM_HALT:71
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA st I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
( CurInstr (Computation (s +* (Initialized (loop I))),(LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I)))) = goto (insloc 0 ) & ( for m being Element of NAT st m <= LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I)) holds
CurInstr (Computation (s +* (Initialized (loop I))),m) <> halt SCM+FSA ) )
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:72
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being Program of SCM+FSA st I is_closed_onInit s & I is_halting_onInit s holds
CurInstr (Computation (s +* (Initialized (loop I))),(LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized I)))) = goto (insloc 0 ) by Th71;

theorem Th73: :: SCM_HALT:73
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . (intloc 0 ) = 1 & s . a > 0 holds
loop (if=0 a,(Goto (insloc 2)),(I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 )))) is_pseudo-closed_on s
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:74
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . a > 0 holds
Initialized (loop (if=0 a,(Goto (insloc 2)),(I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))))) is_pseudo-closed_on s
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:75
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . (intloc 0 ) = 1 holds
( Times a,I is_closed_on s & Times a,I is_halting_on s )
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:76
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a holds
Initialized (Times a,I) is halting
proof end;

registration
let a be read-write Int-Location ;
let I be good Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster Times a,I -> good ;
coherence
Times a,I is good
proof end;
end;

theorem Th77: :: SCM_HALT:77
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . a > 0 holds
ex s2 being State of SCM+FSA ex k being Element of NAT st
( s2 = s +* (Initialized (loop (if=0 a,(Goto (insloc 2)),(I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 )))))) & k = (LifeSpan (s +* (Initialized (if=0 a,(Goto (insloc 2)),(I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))))))) + 1 & (Computation s2,k) . a = (s . a) - 1 & (Computation s2,k) . (intloc 0 ) = 1 & ( for b being read-write Int-Location st b <> a holds
(Computation s2,k) . b = (IExec I,s) . b ) & ( for f being FinSeq-Location holds (Computation s2,k) . f = (IExec I,s) . f ) & IC (Computation s2,k) = insloc 0 & ( for n being Element of NAT st n <= k holds
IC (Computation s2,n) in dom (loop (if=0 a,(Goto (insloc 2)),(I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))))) ) )
proof end;

theorem Th78: :: SCM_HALT:78
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . (intloc 0 ) = 1 & s . a <= 0 holds
DataPart (IExec (Times a,I),s) = DataPart s
proof end;

theorem Th79: :: SCM_HALT:79
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . a > 0 holds
( (IExec (I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))),s) . a = (s . a) - 1 & DataPart (IExec (Times a,I),s) = DataPart (IExec (Times a,I),(IExec (I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))),s)) )
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:80
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for f being FinSeq-Location
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a <= 0 holds
(IExec (Times a,I),s) . f = s . f
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:81
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for b being Int-Location
for a being read-write Int-Location st s . a <= 0 holds
(IExec (Times a,I),s) . b = (Initialize s) . b
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:82
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for f being FinSeq-Location
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . a > 0 holds
(IExec (Times a,I),s) . f = (IExec (Times a,I),(IExec (I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))),s)) . f
proof end;

theorem :: SCM_HALT:83
for s being State of SCM+FSA
for I being good InitHalting Program of SCM+FSA
for b being Int-Location
for a being read-write Int-Location st I does_not_destroy a & s . a > 0 holds
(IExec (Times a,I),s) . b = (IExec (Times a,I),(IExec (I ';' (SubFrom a,(intloc 0 ))),s)) . b
proof end;

definition
let i be Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
attr i is good means :Def6: :: SCM_HALT:def 6
i does_not_destroy intloc 0 ;
end;

:: deftheorem Def6 defines good SCM_HALT:def 6 :
for i being Instruction of SCM+FSA holds
( i is good iff i does_not_destroy intloc 0 );

registration
cluster parahalting good Element of the Instructions of SCM+FSA ;
existence
ex b1 being Instruction of SCM+FSA st
( b1 is parahalting & b1 is good )
proof end;
end;

registration
let i be good Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
let J be good Program of SCM+FSA ;
cluster i ';' J -> good ;
coherence
i ';' J is good
proof end;
cluster J ';' i -> good ;
coherence
J ';' i is good
proof end;
end;

registration
let i, j be good Instruction of SCM+FSA ;
cluster i ';' j -> good ;
coherence
i ';' j is good
proof end;
end;

registration
let a be read-write Int-Location ;
let b be Int-Location ;
cluster a := b -> good ;
coherence
a := b is good
proof end;
cluster SubFrom a,b -> good ;
coherence
SubFrom a,b is good
proof end;
end;

registration
let a be read-write Int-Location ;
let b be Int-Location ;
let f be FinSeq-Location ;
cluster a := f,b -> good ;
coherence
a := f,b is good
proof end;
end;

registration
let a, b be Int-Location ;
let f be FinSeq-Location ;
cluster f,a := b -> good ;
coherence
f,a := b is good
proof end;
end;

registration
let a be read-write Int-Location ;
let f be FinSeq-Location ;
cluster a :=len f -> good ;
coherence
a :=len f is good
proof end;
end;

registration
let n be Element of NAT ;
cluster intloc (n + 1) -> read-write ;
coherence
not intloc (n + 1) is read-only
proof end;
end;