[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [mizar] Formatter questions
- To: mizar-forum@mizar.uwb.edu.pl
- Subject: Re: [mizar] Formatter questions
- From: Josef Urban <josef.urban@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:27:04 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BM/QuNs49LEVZ8msJ+AxLtcGp4gLG8fo2ezzboFM76rv8aJ5iYnMHIFiKRmPwu8f2f eWgQ4h07qoIRfDsNq/rTqKOIrvMS0LFAXqv3ttOQiWBf4bjSYG8fa6hQ9jGTRZq/P/WB hcoadunjEmXVbgPpwUAZkNW2Mb60WilQ4hmG0=
On 5/12/10, Josef Urban <josef.urban@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 5/11/10, Daniel Matichuk <dmatichu@ualberta.ca> wrote:
>> I have a few questions about Mizar with regards to the formatter that I'm
>> working on:
>>
>> 1) Is there a comprehensive list of the meanings of all the intermediate
>> files that are generated for an article?
>
> Probably not.
For the xml-ized files, you can get some basic information by looking
up their top element at
http://mizar.uwb.edu.pl/version/current/doc/xml/Mizar.html, e.g.:
http://mizar.uwb.edu.pl/version/current/doc/xml/Mizar.html#Constructors
Josef
>
>> I have some vague ideas like "parx"
>> seems to be related to tokenization, but really I'd like a list of what
>> each
>> of these is for.
>
> .parx is a very new thing - an attempt to gradually xml-ize the
> Parser's output. It is a moving target and probably should not be
> relied upon in its current state.
>
>>
>> 2) Related to 1), is there an intermediate file that is an abstract
>> syntax
>> tree,
>
> To various degree the .par and .xml files.
>
> Best,
> Josef
>
>> or is it possible to have Mizar generate and abstract syntax tree for
>> an article? Ideally for formatting you'd just like an AST annotated with
>> identifiers.
>>
>> 3) Is the grammar posted at
>> http://mizar.uwb.edu.pl/version/current/doc/syntax.txt up-to-date?
>>
>