[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [mizar] Formatter questions
- To: mizar-forum@mizar.uwb.edu.pl
- Subject: Re: [mizar] Formatter questions
- From: Josef Urban <josef.urban@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 18:37:13 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LM7dcV73OltAVdCKtaxmAUvqBO4TNiJtcXT5wJNt5ZVJK/ogHIOyJO+PFLbEBJRTEu 7wvVSUmMt2pjY01nJWR1uzgBYkx8rqTxVOD9PCfJSCo3ATsleBLl7bprfP1xqK79Ayp0 LGmk+6J0MswdxtLqXVSD+qFj+9hy8QyA9LV6o=
Hi Daniel,
On 5/11/10, Daniel Matichuk <dmatichu@ualberta.ca> wrote:
> I have a few questions about Mizar with regards to the formatter that I'm
> working on:
>
> 1) Is there a comprehensive list of the meanings of all the intermediate
> files that are generated for an article?
Probably not.
> I have some vague ideas like "parx"
> seems to be related to tokenization, but really I'd like a list of what each
> of these is for.
.parx is a very new thing - an attempt to gradually xml-ize the
Parser's output. It is a moving target and probably should not be
relied upon in its current state.
>
> 2) Related to 1), is there an intermediate file that is an abstract syntax
> tree,
To various degree the .par and .xml files.
Best,
Josef
> or is it possible to have Mizar generate and abstract syntax tree for
> an article? Ideally for formatting you'd just like an AST annotated with
> identifiers.
>
> 3) Is the grammar posted at
> http://mizar.uwb.edu.pl/version/current/doc/syntax.txt up-to-date?
>