:: The Basic Properties of { \bf SCM } over Ring
:: by Artur Korni{\l}owicz
::
:: Received November 29, 1998
:: Copyright (c) 1998-2011 Association of Mizar Users

begin

registration

cluster non empty trivial right_complementable strict V149() V150() V151() V159() V166() V167() doubleLoopStr ;
existence
ex b₁ being Ring st
( b₁ is strict & b₁ is trivial )

proof end;

end;

definition

let R be good Ring;
func SCM R -> strict AMI-Struct of { the carrier of R} means :Def1: :: SCMRING2:def 1
( the carrier of it = SCM-Memory & the ZeroF of it = NAT & the Instructions of it = SCM-Instr R & the haltF of it = [0,{},{}] & the Object-Kind of it = SCM-OK R & the Execution of it = SCM-Exec R );
existence
ex b₁ being strict AMI-Struct of { the carrier of R} st
( the carrier of b₁ = SCM-Memory & the ZeroF of b₁ = NAT & the Instructions of b₁ = SCM-Instr R & the haltF of b₁ = [0,{},{}] & the Object-Kind of b₁ = SCM-OK R & the Execution of b₁ = SCM-Exec R )

proof end;

uniqueness
for b₁, b₂ being strict AMI-Struct of { the carrier of R} st the carrier of b₁ = SCM-Memory & the ZeroF of b₁ = NAT & the Instructions of b₁ = SCM-Instr R & the haltF of b₁ = [0,{},{}] & the Object-Kind of b₁ = SCM-OK R & the Execution of b₁ = SCM-Exec R & the carrier of b₂ = SCM-Memory & the ZeroF of b₂ = NAT & the Instructions of b₂ = SCM-Instr R & the haltF of b₂ = [0,{},{}] & the Object-Kind of b₂ = SCM-OK R & the Execution of b₂ = SCM-Exec R holds
b₁ = b₂ ;

end;

:: deftheorem Def1 defines SCM SCMRING2:def 1 :
for R being good Ring
for b₂ being strict AMI-Struct of { the carrier of R} holds
( b₂ = SCM R iff ( the carrier of b₂ = SCM-Memory & the ZeroF of b₂ = NAT & the Instructions of b₂ = SCM-Instr R & the haltF of b₂ = [0,{},{}] & the Object-Kind of b₂ = SCM-OK R & the Execution of b₂ = SCM-Exec R ) );

registration

let R be good Ring;
cluster SCM R -> non empty stored-program standard-ins strict ;
coherence
( not SCM R is empty & SCM R is stored-program & SCM R is standard-ins )

proof end;

end;

definition

let R be good Ring;
mode Data-Location of R -> Object of (SCM R) means :Def2: :: SCMRING2:def 2
it in the carrier of (SCM R) \ (NAT \/ {NAT});
existence
ex b₁ being Object of (SCM R) st b₁ in the carrier of (SCM R) \ (NAT \/ {NAT})

proof end;

end;

:: deftheorem Def2 defines Data-Location SCMRING2:def 2 :
for R being good Ring
for b₂ being Object of (SCM R) holds
( b₂ is Data-Location of R iff b₂ in the carrier of (SCM R) \ (NAT \/ {NAT}) );

theorem Th1: :: SCMRING2:1

for x being set
for R being good Ring holds
( x is Data-Location of R iff x in Data-Locations SCM )

proof end;

definition

let R be good Ring;
let s be State of (SCM R);
let a be Data-Location of R;
:: original: .
redefine func s . a -> Element of R;
coherence
s . a is Element of R

proof end;

end;

theorem :: SCMRING2:2

canceled;

theorem Th3: :: SCMRING2:3

for R being good Ring holds [0,{},{}] is Instruction of (SCM R) by Def1;

theorem Th4: :: SCMRING2:4

for S being non empty 1-sorted
for x being set
for R being good Ring
for d1, d2 being Data-Location of R st x in {1,2,3,4} holds
[x,{},<*d1,d2*>] in SCM-Instr S

proof end;

theorem Th5: :: SCMRING2:5

for S being non empty 1-sorted
for t being Element of S
for R being good Ring
for d1 being Data-Location of R holds [5,{},<*d1,t*>] in SCM-Instr S

proof end;

theorem Th6: :: SCMRING2:6

for S being non empty 1-sorted
for i1 being Element of NAT holds [6,<*i1*>,{}] in SCM-Instr S

proof end;

theorem Th7: :: SCMRING2:7

for S being non empty 1-sorted
for R being good Ring
for d1 being Data-Location of R
for i1 being Element of NAT holds [7,<*i1*>,<*d1*>] in SCM-Instr S

proof end;

definition

let R be good Ring;
let a, b be Data-Location of R;
func a := b -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 3
[1,{},<*a,b*>];
coherence
[1,{},<*a,b*>] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

func AddTo (a,b) -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 4
[2,{},<*a,b*>];
coherence
[2,{},<*a,b*>] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

func SubFrom (a,b) -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 5
[3,{},<*a,b*>];
coherence
[3,{},<*a,b*>] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

func MultBy (a,b) -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 6
[4,{},<*a,b*>];
coherence
[4,{},<*a,b*>] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

end;

:: deftheorem defines := SCMRING2:def 3 :
for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds a := b = [1,{},<*a,b*>];

:: deftheorem defines AddTo SCMRING2:def 4 :
for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds AddTo (a,b) = [2,{},<*a,b*>];

:: deftheorem defines SubFrom SCMRING2:def 5 :
for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds SubFrom (a,b) = [3,{},<*a,b*>];

:: deftheorem defines MultBy SCMRING2:def 6 :
for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds MultBy (a,b) = [4,{},<*a,b*>];

definition

let R be good Ring;
let a be Data-Location of R;
let r be Element of R;
func a := r -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 7
[5,{},<*a,r*>];
coherence
[5,{},<*a,r*>] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

end;

:: deftheorem defines := SCMRING2:def 7 :
for R being good Ring
for a being Data-Location of R
for r being Element of R holds a := r = [5,{},<*a,r*>];

definition

let R be good Ring;
let l be Element of NAT ;
func goto (l,R) -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 8
[6,<*l*>,{}];
coherence
[6,<*l*>,{}] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

end;

:: deftheorem defines goto SCMRING2:def 8 :
for R being good Ring
for l being Element of NAT holds goto (l,R) = [6,<*l*>,{}];

definition

let R be good Ring;
let l be Element of NAT ;
let a be Data-Location of R;
func a =0_goto l -> Instruction of (SCM R) equals :: SCMRING2:def 9
[7,<*l*>,<*a*>];
coherence
[7,<*l*>,<*a*>] is Instruction of (SCM R)

proof end;

end;

:: deftheorem defines =0_goto SCMRING2:def 9 :
for R being good Ring
for l being Element of NAT
for a being Data-Location of R holds a =0_goto l = [7,<*l*>,<*a*>];

theorem Th8: :: SCMRING2:8

for R being good Ring
for I being set holds
( I is Instruction of (SCM R) iff ( I = [0,{},{}] or ex a, b being Data-Location of R st I = a := b or ex a, b being Data-Location of R st I = AddTo (a,b) or ex a, b being Data-Location of R st I = SubFrom (a,b) or ex a, b being Data-Location of R st I = MultBy (a,b) or ex i1 being Element of NAT st I = goto (i1,R) or ex a being Data-Location of R ex i1 being Element of NAT st I = a =0_goto i1 or ex a being Data-Location of R ex r being Element of R st I = a := r ) )

proof end;

registration

let R be good Ring;
cluster SCM R -> IC-Ins-separated proper-halt strict ;
coherence
( SCM R is proper-halt & SCM R is IC-Ins-separated )

proof end;

end;

theorem :: SCMRING2:9

for R being good Ring holds IC = NAT by Def1;

theorem :: SCMRING2:10

for R being good Ring
for s being State of (SCM R)
for S being SCM-State of R st S = s holds
IC s = IC S by Def1;

theorem :: SCMRING2:11

canceled;

theorem Th12: :: SCMRING2:12

for R being good Ring
for s being State of (SCM R)
for I being Instruction of (SCM R)
for i being Element of SCM-Instr R st i = I holds
for S being SCM-State of R st S = s holds
Exec (I,s) = SCM-Exec-Res (i,S)

proof end;

begin

theorem Th13: :: SCMRING2:13

for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( (Exec ((a := b),s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) & (Exec ((a := b),s)) . a = s . b & ( for c being Data-Location of R st c <> a holds
(Exec ((a := b),s)) . c = s . c ) )

proof end;

theorem Th14: :: SCMRING2:14

for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( (Exec ((AddTo (a,b)),s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) & (Exec ((AddTo (a,b)),s)) . a = (s . a) + (s . b) & ( for c being Data-Location of R st c <> a holds
(Exec ((AddTo (a,b)),s)) . c = s . c ) )

proof end;

theorem Th15: :: SCMRING2:15

for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( (Exec ((SubFrom (a,b)),s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) & (Exec ((SubFrom (a,b)),s)) . a = (s . a) - (s . b) & ( for c being Data-Location of R st c <> a holds
(Exec ((SubFrom (a,b)),s)) . c = s . c ) )

proof end;

theorem Th16: :: SCMRING2:16

for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( (Exec ((MultBy (a,b)),s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) & (Exec ((MultBy (a,b)),s)) . a = (s . a) * (s . b) & ( for c being Data-Location of R st c <> a holds
(Exec ((MultBy (a,b)),s)) . c = s . c ) )

proof end;

theorem :: SCMRING2:17

for R being good Ring
for c being Data-Location of R
for i1 being Element of NAT
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( (Exec ((goto (i1,R)),s)) . (IC ) = i1 & (Exec ((goto (i1,R)),s)) . c = s . c )

proof end;

theorem Th18: :: SCMRING2:18

for R being good Ring
for a, c being Data-Location of R
for i1 being Element of NAT
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( ( s . a = 0. R implies (Exec ((a =0_goto i1),s)) . (IC ) = i1 ) & ( s . a <> 0. R implies (Exec ((a =0_goto i1),s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) ) & (Exec ((a =0_goto i1),s)) . c = s . c )

proof end;

theorem Th19: :: SCMRING2:19

for R being good Ring
for r being Element of R
for a being Data-Location of R
for s being State of (SCM R) holds
( (Exec ((a := r),s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) & (Exec ((a := r),s)) . a = r & ( for c being Data-Location of R st c <> a holds
(Exec ((a := r),s)) . c = s . c ) )

proof end;

begin

theorem Th20: :: SCMRING2:20

for R being good Ring
for I being Instruction of (SCM R) st ex s being State of (SCM R) st (Exec (I,s)) . (IC ) = succ (IC s) holds
not I is halting

proof end;

theorem Th21: :: SCMRING2:21

for R being good Ring
for I being Instruction of (SCM R) st I = [0,{},{}] holds
I is halting

proof end;

Lm1: for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds not a := b is halting

proof end;

Lm2: for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds not AddTo (a,b) is halting

proof end;

Lm3: for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds not SubFrom (a,b) is halting

proof end;

Lm4: for R being good Ring
for a, b being Data-Location of R holds not MultBy (a,b) is halting

proof end;

Lm5: for R being good Ring
for i1 being Element of NAT holds not goto (i1,R) is halting

proof end;

Lm6: for R being good Ring
for a being Data-Location of R
for i1 being Element of NAT holds not a =0_goto i1 is halting

proof end;

Lm7: for R being good Ring
for r being Element of R
for a being Data-Location of R holds not a := r is halting

proof end;

registration

let R be good Ring;
let a, b be Data-Location of R;
cluster a := b -> non halting ;
coherence
not a := b is halting by Lm1;
cluster AddTo (a,b) -> non halting ;
coherence
not AddTo (a,b) is halting by Lm2;
cluster SubFrom (a,b) -> non halting ;
coherence
not SubFrom (a,b) is halting by Lm3;
cluster MultBy (a,b) -> non halting ;
coherence
not MultBy (a,b) is halting by Lm4;

end;

registration

let R be good Ring;
let i1 be Element of NAT ;
cluster goto (i1,R) -> non halting ;
coherence
not goto (i1,R) is halting by Lm5;

end;

registration

let R be good Ring;
let a be Data-Location of R;
let i1 be Element of NAT ;
cluster a =0_goto i1 -> non halting ;
coherence
not a =0_goto i1 is halting by Lm6;

end;

registration

let R be good Ring;
let a be Data-Location of R;
let r be Element of R;
cluster a := r -> non halting ;
coherence
not a := r is halting by Lm7;

end;

Lm8: for R being good Ring
for W being Instruction of (SCM R) st W is halting holds
W = [0,{},{}]

proof end;

registration

let R be good Ring;
cluster SCM R -> definite realistic strict halting ;
coherence
( SCM R is halting & SCM R is definite & SCM R is realistic )

proof end;

end;

theorem :: SCMRING2:22

canceled;

theorem :: SCMRING2:23

canceled;

theorem :: SCMRING2:24

canceled;

theorem :: SCMRING2:25

canceled;

theorem :: SCMRING2:26

canceled;

theorem :: SCMRING2:27

canceled;

theorem :: SCMRING2:28

canceled;

theorem Th29: :: SCMRING2:29

for R being good Ring
for I being Instruction of (SCM R) st I is halting holds
I = halt (SCM R)

proof end;

theorem :: SCMRING2:30

for R being good Ring holds halt (SCM R) = [0,{},{}]

proof end;

theorem Th31: :: SCMRING2:31

for R being good Ring holds Data-Locations (SCM R) = Data-Locations SCM

proof end;

theorem :: SCMRING2:32

for x being set
for R being good Ring holds
( x is Data-Location of R iff x in Data-Locations (SCM R) )

proof end;