From owner-qed Fri Nov 18 09:12:50 1994
Received: from localhost (listserv@localhost) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.4/8.6.4) id JAA20655 for qed-out; Fri, 18 Nov 1994 09:12:30 -0600
Received: from chelm.nmt.edu (chelm.nmt.edu [129.138.6.50]) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA20647 for <qed@mcs.anl.gov>; Fri, 18 Nov 1994 09:12:22 -0600
Received: (from yodaiken@localhost) by chelm.nmt.edu (8.6.8.1/8.6.6) id IAA00530; Fri, 18 Nov 1994 08:14:31 -0700
Message-Id: <199411181514.IAA00530@chelm.nmt.edu>
From: yodaiken@sphinx.nmt.edu (Victor Yodaiken)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 08:14:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: Lyle Burkhead <LYBRHED@delphi.com>
       "The Fermat-Wiles Theorem" (Nov 18,  4:03am)
reply_to: yodaiken@chelm.nmt.edu
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Lyle Burkhead <LYBRHED@delphi.com>, qed@mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: The Fermat-Wiles Theorem
Sender: owner-qed@mcs.anl.gov
Precedence: bulk

On Nov 18,  4:03am, Lyle Burkhead wrote:
 Subject: The Fermat-Wiles Theorem
>However, QED was originally conceived as a project comprising 
>"all of mathematics."  If it is going to degenerate into a tool for 
>engineers, it is a waste of time (from a scientific standpoint). 

Why? 

>What can QED offer pure mathematicians?  This question may 

What can crystalography offer pure mathematicians?