From owner-qed Sun Nov  6 10:09:01 1994
Received: from localhost (listserv@localhost) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.4/8.6.4) id KAA07390 for qed-out; Sun, 6 Nov 1994 10:07:20 -0600
Received: from emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk (root@emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk [131.111.24.1]) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.4/8.6.4) with SMTP id KAA07385 for <qed@mcs.anl.gov>; Sun, 6 Nov 1994 10:07:14 -0600
Received: by emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk (UK-Smail 3.1.25.1/1); Sun, 6 Nov 94 16:07 GMT
Message-Id: <m0r4A7c-0003UaC@emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 94 16:07 GMT
From: Thomas Forster <T.Forster@pmms.cam.ac.uk>
To: Zdzislaw.Meglicki@cisr.anu.edu.au, debruijn@win.tue.nl
Subject: Re: Intuition about Freiling's axiom
Cc: qed@mcs.anl.gov
Sender: owner-qed@mcs.anl.gov
Precedence: bulk

Meglicki's point is not very new, but it is very important.
he says
``Nature herself engraved on our minds the
basic mathematical notions pertaining to the Universe we live in over
billions of years of natural evolution. Animals without any mathematical
training, education or culture are perfectly capable of recognising
basic geometrical notions and relations in their neighbourhood. They are
also perfectly capable of using "greater then" relation in assessing
potential danger or sources of food \ldots"

I have often recommended my students to read R. McNeil Alexander:
Optima for Animals which provides some nice detail to back up this
point.
      Thomas Forster

