let H be ZF-formula; for M being non empty set
for v, v9 being Function of VAR,M st ( for x being Variable st x in Free H holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= H holds
M,v9 |= H
let M be non empty set ; for v, v9 being Function of VAR,M st ( for x being Variable st x in Free H holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= H holds
M,v9 |= H
defpred S1[ ZF-formula] means for v, v9 being Function of VAR,M st ( for x being Variable st x in Free $1 holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= $1 holds
M,v9 |= $1;
A1:
for H1, H2 being ZF-formula st S1[H1] & S1[H2] holds
S1[H1 '&' H2]
proof
let H1,
H2 be
ZF-formula;
( S1[H1] & S1[H2] implies S1[H1 '&' H2] )
assume that A2:
S1[
H1]
and A3:
S1[
H2]
;
S1[H1 '&' H2]
let v,
v9 be
Function of
VAR,
M;
( ( for x being Variable st x in Free (H1 '&' H2) holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= H1 '&' H2 implies M,v9 |= H1 '&' H2 )
assume A4:
for
x being
Variable st
x in Free (H1 '&' H2) holds
v9 . x = v . x
;
( not M,v |= H1 '&' H2 or M,v9 |= H1 '&' H2 )
A5:
Free (H1 '&' H2) = (Free H1) \/ (Free H2)
by Th61;
assume A7:
M,
v |= H1 '&' H2
;
M,v9 |= H1 '&' H2
then
M,
v |= H2
by ZF_MODEL:15;
then A8:
M,
v9 |= H2
by A3, A6;
M,
v |= H1
by A7, ZF_MODEL:15;
then
M,
v9 |= H1
by A2, A9;
hence
M,
v9 |= H1 '&' H2
by A8, ZF_MODEL:15;
verum
end;
A10:
for x1, x2 being Variable holds
( S1[x1 '=' x2] & S1[x1 'in' x2] )
proof
let x1,
x2 be
Variable;
( S1[x1 '=' x2] & S1[x1 'in' x2] )
A11:
Free (x1 '=' x2) = {x1,x2}
by Th58;
thus
S1[
x1 '=' x2]
S1[x1 'in' x2]proof
let v,
v9 be
Function of
VAR,
M;
( ( for x being Variable st x in Free (x1 '=' x2) holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= x1 '=' x2 implies M,v9 |= x1 '=' x2 )
assume A12:
for
x being
Variable st
x in Free (x1 '=' x2) holds
v9 . x = v . x
;
( not M,v |= x1 '=' x2 or M,v9 |= x1 '=' x2 )
x2 in Free (x1 '=' x2)
by A11, TARSKI:def 2;
then A13:
v9 . x2 = v . x2
by A12;
assume
M,
v |= x1 '=' x2
;
M,v9 |= x1 '=' x2
then A14:
v . x1 = v . x2
by ZF_MODEL:12;
x1 in Free (x1 '=' x2)
by A11, TARSKI:def 2;
then
v9 . x1 = v . x1
by A12;
hence
M,
v9 |= x1 '=' x2
by A14, A13, ZF_MODEL:12;
verum
end;
let v,
v9 be
Function of
VAR,
M;
( ( for x being Variable st x in Free (x1 'in' x2) holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= x1 'in' x2 implies M,v9 |= x1 'in' x2 )
assume A15:
for
x being
Variable st
x in Free (x1 'in' x2) holds
v9 . x = v . x
;
( not M,v |= x1 'in' x2 or M,v9 |= x1 'in' x2 )
A16:
Free (x1 'in' x2) = {x1,x2}
by Th59;
then
x2 in Free (x1 'in' x2)
by TARSKI:def 2;
then A17:
v9 . x2 = v . x2
by A15;
assume
M,
v |= x1 'in' x2
;
M,v9 |= x1 'in' x2
then A18:
v . x1 in v . x2
by ZF_MODEL:13;
x1 in Free (x1 'in' x2)
by A16, TARSKI:def 2;
then
v9 . x1 = v . x1
by A15;
hence
M,
v9 |= x1 'in' x2
by A18, A17, ZF_MODEL:13;
verum
end;
A19:
for H being ZF-formula
for x being Variable st S1[H] holds
S1[ All (x,H)]
proof
let H be
ZF-formula;
for x being Variable st S1[H] holds
S1[ All (x,H)]let x1 be
Variable;
( S1[H] implies S1[ All (x1,H)] )
assume A20:
S1[
H]
;
S1[ All (x1,H)]
let v,
v9 be
Function of
VAR,
M;
( ( for x being Variable st x in Free (All (x1,H)) holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= All (x1,H) implies M,v9 |= All (x1,H) )
assume that A21:
for
x being
Variable st
x in Free (All (x1,H)) holds
v9 . x = v . x
and A22:
M,
v |= All (
x1,
H)
;
M,v9 |= All (x1,H)
now for m being Element of M holds M,v9 / (x1,m) |= Hlet m be
Element of
M;
M,v9 / (x1,m) |= HA23:
Free (All (x1,H)) = (Free H) \ {x1}
by Th62;
A24:
now for x being Variable st x in Free H holds
(v9 / (x1,m)) . x = (v / (x1,m)) . xlet x be
Variable;
( x in Free H implies (v9 / (x1,m)) . x = (v / (x1,m)) . x )assume
x in Free H
;
(v9 / (x1,m)) . x = (v / (x1,m)) . xthen
( (
x in Free (All (x1,H)) & not
x in {x1} ) or
x in {x1} )
by A23, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
( (
v9 . x = v . x &
x <> x1 ) or
x = x1 )
by A21, TARSKI:def 1;
then
( (
(v9 / (x1,m)) . x = v . x &
v . x = (v / (x1,m)) . x ) or (
(v / (x1,m)) . x = m &
(v9 / (x1,m)) . x = m ) )
by FUNCT_7:32, FUNCT_7:128;
hence
(v9 / (x1,m)) . x = (v / (x1,m)) . x
;
verum end;
M,
v / (
x1,
m)
|= H
by A22, Th71;
hence
M,
v9 / (
x1,
m)
|= H
by A20, A24;
verum end;
hence
M,
v9 |= All (
x1,
H)
by Th71;
verum
end;
A25:
for H being ZF-formula st S1[H] holds
S1[ 'not' H]
proof
let H be
ZF-formula;
( S1[H] implies S1[ 'not' H] )
assume A26:
S1[
H]
;
S1[ 'not' H]
let v,
v9 be
Function of
VAR,
M;
( ( for x being Variable st x in Free ('not' H) holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= 'not' H implies M,v9 |= 'not' H )
assume A27:
for
x being
Variable st
x in Free ('not' H) holds
v9 . x = v . x
;
( not M,v |= 'not' H or M,v9 |= 'not' H )
assume
M,
v |= 'not' H
;
M,v9 |= 'not' H
then
not
M,
v |= H
by ZF_MODEL:14;
then
not
M,
v9 |= H
by A26, A28;
hence
M,
v9 |= 'not' H
by ZF_MODEL:14;
verum
end;
for H being ZF-formula holds S1[H]
from ZF_LANG1:sch 1(A10, A25, A1, A19);
hence
for v, v9 being Function of VAR,M st ( for x being Variable st x in Free H holds
v9 . x = v . x ) & M,v |= H holds
M,v9 |= H
; verum