let H be ZF-formula; :: thesis: ( H is atomic iff Subformulae H = {H} )
thus ( H is atomic implies Subformulae H = {H} ) :: thesis: ( Subformulae H = {H} implies H is atomic )
proof end;
assume A1: Subformulae H = {H} ; :: thesis: H is atomic
A2: now :: thesis: not H = 'not' (the_argument_of H)end;
A5: now :: thesis: not H = (the_left_argument_of H) '&' (the_right_argument_of H)end;
assume not H is atomic ; :: thesis: contradiction
then ( H is negative or H is conjunctive or H is universal ) by Th10;
then ( H = 'not' (the_argument_of H) or H = (the_left_argument_of H) '&' (the_right_argument_of H) or H = All ((bound_in H),(the_scope_of H)) ) by Def30, Th40, Th44;
then A8: the_scope_of H is_immediate_constituent_of H by A2, A5;
then the_scope_of H is_proper_subformula_of H by Th61;
then the_scope_of H is_subformula_of H ;
then A9: the_scope_of H in Subformulae H by Def42;
len (the_scope_of H) <> len H by A8, Th60;
hence contradiction by A1, A9, TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum