let it1, it2 be Convergence-Class of T; :: thesis: ( ( for N being net of T
for p being Point of T holds
( [N,p] in it1 iff ( N in NetUniv T & p in Lim N ) ) ) & ( for N being net of T
for p being Point of T holds
( [N,p] in it2 iff ( N in NetUniv T & p in Lim N ) ) ) implies it1 = it2 )

assume that
A3: for N being net of T
for p being Point of T holds
( [N,p] in it1 iff ( N in NetUniv T & p in Lim N ) ) and
A4: for N being net of T
for p being Point of T holds
( [N,p] in it2 iff ( N in NetUniv T & p in Lim N ) ) ; :: thesis: it1 = it2
let x, y be object ; :: according to RELAT_1:def 2 :: thesis: ( ( not [x,y] in it1 or [x,y] in it2 ) & ( not [x,y] in it2 or [x,y] in it1 ) )
A5: it1 c= [:(NetUniv T), the carrier of T:] by Def18;
thus ( [x,y] in it1 implies [x,y] in it2 ) :: thesis: ( not [x,y] in it2 or [x,y] in it1 )
proof
assume A6: [x,y] in it1 ; :: thesis: [x,y] in it2
then reconsider p = y as Point of T by A5, ZFMISC_1:87;
x in NetUniv T by A5, A6, ZFMISC_1:87;
then consider N being strict net of T such that
A7: N = x and
the carrier of N in the_universe_of the carrier of T by Def11;
[N,p] in it1 by A6, A7;
then A8: N in NetUniv T by A3;
p in Lim N by A3, A6, A7;
hence [x,y] in it2 by A4, A7, A8; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume A9: [x,y] in it2 ; :: thesis: [x,y] in it1
A10: it2 c= [:(NetUniv T), the carrier of T:] by Def18;
then reconsider p = y as Point of T by A9, ZFMISC_1:87;
x in NetUniv T by A10, A9, ZFMISC_1:87;
then consider N being strict net of T such that
A11: N = x and
the carrier of N in the_universe_of the carrier of T by Def11;
[N,p] in it2 by A9, A11;
then A12: N in NetUniv T by A4;
p in Lim N by A4, A9, A11;
hence [x,y] in it1 by A3, A11, A12; :: thesis: verum