let S, T be non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset; ( [:S,T:] is continuous implies ( S is continuous & T is continuous ) )
assume that
A1:
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( not waybelow x is empty & waybelow x is directed )
and
A2:
( [:S,T:] is up-complete & [:S,T:] is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation )
; WAYBEL_3:def 6 ( S is continuous & T is continuous )
hereby WAYBEL_3:def 6 T is continuous
thus
S is
up-complete
;
S is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation thus
S is
satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
verumproof
set t = the
Element of
T;
let s be
Element of
S;
WAYBEL_3:def 5 s = "\/" ((waybelow s),S)
waybelow [s, the Element of T] is
directed
by A1;
then
ex_sup_of waybelow [s, the Element of T],
[:S,T:]
by WAYBEL_0:75;
then A4:
sup (waybelow [s, the Element of T]) = [(sup (proj1 (waybelow [s, the Element of T]))),(sup (proj2 (waybelow [s, the Element of T])))]
by Th5;
thus s =
[s, the Element of T] `1
.=
(sup (waybelow [s, the Element of T])) `1
by A2
.=
sup (proj1 (waybelow [s, the Element of T]))
by A4
.=
sup (waybelow ([s, the Element of T] `1))
by Th46
.=
sup (waybelow s)
;
verum
end;
end;
set s = the Element of S;
thus
T is up-complete
; T is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
let t be Element of T; WAYBEL_3:def 5 t = "\/" ((waybelow t),T)
then A6:
sup (waybelow [ the Element of S,t]) = [(sup (proj1 (waybelow [ the Element of S,t]))),(sup (proj2 (waybelow [ the Element of S,t])))]
by Th5;
thus t =
[ the Element of S,t] `2
.=
(sup (waybelow [ the Element of S,t])) `2
by A2
.=
sup (proj2 (waybelow [ the Element of S,t]))
by A6
.=
sup (waybelow ([ the Element of S,t] `2))
by Th47
.=
sup (waybelow t)
; verum