let r, s, t be ExtReal; :: thesis: ( r < s & s <= t implies ].r,t.] \ {s} = ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] )
assume that
A1: r < s and
A2: s <= t ; :: thesis: ].r,t.] \ {s} = ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.]
let p be ExtReal; :: according to MEMBERED:def 14 :: thesis: ( ( not p in ].r,t.] \ {s} or p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] ) & ( not p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] or p in ].r,t.] \ {s} ) )
thus ( p in ].r,t.] \ {s} implies p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] ) :: thesis: ( not p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] or p in ].r,t.] \ {s} )

proof

assume A3: p in ].r,t.] \ {s} ; :: thesis: p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.]
then not p in {s} by XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then p <> s by TARSKI:def 1;
then ( ( r < p & p < s ) or ( s < p & p <= t ) ) by A3, Th2, XXREAL_0:1;
then ( p in ].r,s.[ or p in ].s,t.] ) by Th2, Th4;
hence p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] by XBOOLE_0:def 3; :: thesis: verum

end;

assume p in ].r,s.[ \/ ].s,t.] ; :: thesis: p in ].r,t.] \ {s}
then ( p in ].r,s.[ or p in ].s,t.] ) by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then A4: ( ( r < p & p < s ) or ( s < p & p <= t ) ) by Th2, Th4;
then A5: r < p by A1, XXREAL_0:2;
p <= t by A2, A4, XXREAL_0:2;
then A6: p in ].r,t.] by A5, Th2;
not p in {s} by A4, TARSKI:def 1;
hence p in ].r,t.] \ {s} by A6, XBOOLE_0:def 5; :: thesis: verum