let L be lower-bounded algebraic LATTICE; :: thesis: ( L is arithmetic iff L -waybelow is multiplicative )
thus ( L is arithmetic implies L -waybelow is multiplicative ) :: thesis: ( L -waybelow is multiplicative implies L is arithmetic )
proof
assume A1: L is arithmetic ; :: thesis: L -waybelow is multiplicative
now :: thesis: for a, x, y being Element of L st [a,x] in L -waybelow & [a,y] in L -waybelow holds
[a,(x "/\" y)] in L -waybelow
reconsider C = CompactSublatt L as non empty full meet-inheriting SubRelStr of L by A1;
let a, x, y be Element of L; :: thesis: ( [a,x] in L -waybelow & [a,y] in L -waybelow implies [a,(x "/\" y)] in L -waybelow )
assume that
A2: [a,x] in L -waybelow and
A3: [a,y] in L -waybelow ; :: thesis: [a,(x "/\" y)] in L -waybelow
a << x by A2, WAYBEL_4:def 1;
then consider c being Element of L such that
A4: c in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L) and
A5: a <= c and
A6: c <= x by Th7;
a << y by A3, WAYBEL_4:def 1;
then consider k being Element of L such that
A7: k in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L) and
A8: a <= k and
A9: k <= y by Th7;
A10: c "/\" k <= x "/\" y by A6, A9, YELLOW_3:2;
reconsider c9 = c, k9 = k as Element of C by A4, A7;
c9 "/\" k9 in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L) ;
then c "/\" k in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L) by YELLOW_0:69;
then c "/\" k is compact by Def1;
then A11: c "/\" k << c "/\" k by WAYBEL_3:def 2;
a "/\" a = a by YELLOW_5:2;
then a <= c "/\" k by A5, A8, YELLOW_3:2;
then a << x "/\" y by A10, A11, WAYBEL_3:2;
hence [a,(x "/\" y)] in L -waybelow by WAYBEL_4:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence L -waybelow is multiplicative by WAYBEL_7:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume A12: L -waybelow is multiplicative ; :: thesis: L is arithmetic
now :: thesis: for x, y being Element of L st x in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L) & y in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L) & ex_inf_of {x,y},L holds
inf {x,y} in the carrier of (CompactSublatt L)
end;
then CompactSublatt L is meet-inheriting by YELLOW_0:def 16;
hence L is arithmetic ; :: thesis: verum