let L be lower-bounded with_suprema Poset; for R being auxiliary(i) auxiliary(ii) Relation of L
for C being strict_chain of R st C is maximal & R is satisfying_SI holds
R satisfies_SIC_on C
let R be auxiliary(i) auxiliary(ii) Relation of L; for C being strict_chain of R st C is maximal & R is satisfying_SI holds
R satisfies_SIC_on C
let C be strict_chain of R; ( C is maximal & R is satisfying_SI implies R satisfies_SIC_on C )
assume that
A1:
C is maximal
and
A2:
R is satisfying_SI
; R satisfies_SIC_on C
let x, z be Element of L; WAYBEL35:def 6 ( x in C & z in C & [x,z] in R & x <> z implies ex y being Element of L st
( y in C & [x,y] in R & [y,z] in R & x <> y ) )
assume that
A3:
x in C
and
A4:
z in C
and
A5:
[x,z] in R
and
A6:
x <> z
; ex y being Element of L st
( y in C & [x,y] in R & [y,z] in R & x <> y )
consider y being Element of L such that
A7:
[x,y] in R
and
A8:
[y,z] in R
and
A9:
x <> y
by A2, A5, A6, WAYBEL_4:def 20;
A10:
y <= z
by A8, WAYBEL_4:def 3;
assume A11:
for y being Element of L holds
( not y in C or not [x,y] in R or not [y,z] in R or not x <> y )
; contradiction
A12:
x <= y
by A7, WAYBEL_4:def 3;
A13:
C \/ {y} is strict_chain of R
C c= C \/ {y}
by XBOOLE_1:7;
then
C \/ {y} = C
by A13, A1;
then
y in C
by ZFMISC_1:39;
hence
contradiction
by A11, A7, A8, A9; verum