let L be complete LATTICE; for c being closure Function of L,L holds
( Image c is directed-sups-inheriting iff inclusion c is directed-sups-preserving )
let c be closure Function of L,L; ( Image c is directed-sups-inheriting iff inclusion c is directed-sups-preserving )
set ic = inclusion c;
thus
( Image c is directed-sups-inheriting implies inclusion c is directed-sups-preserving )
( inclusion c is directed-sups-preserving implies Image c is directed-sups-inheriting )proof
assume A1:
Image c is
directed-sups-inheriting
;
inclusion c is directed-sups-preserving
let D be
Subset of
(Image c);
WAYBEL_0:def 37 ( D is empty or not D is directed or inclusion c preserves_sup_of D )
assume A2:
( not
D is
empty &
D is
directed )
;
inclusion c preserves_sup_of D
then reconsider E =
D as non
empty directed Subset of
L by YELLOW_2:7;
A3:
(inclusion c) .: D = E
by WAYBEL15:12;
assume
ex_sup_of D,
Image c
;
WAYBEL_0:def 31 ( ex_sup_of (inclusion c) .: D,L & "\/" (((inclusion c) .: D),L) = (inclusion c) . ("\/" (D,(Image c))) )
thus
ex_sup_of (inclusion c) .: D,
L
by YELLOW_0:17;
"\/" (((inclusion c) .: D),L) = (inclusion c) . ("\/" (D,(Image c)))
hence sup ((inclusion c) .: D) =
sup D
by A1, A2, A3, WAYBEL_0:7
.=
(inclusion c) . (sup D)
by FUNCT_1:18
;
verum
end;
assume A4:
inclusion c is directed-sups-preserving
; Image c is directed-sups-inheriting
let X be directed Subset of (Image c); WAYBEL_0:def 4 ( X = {} or not ex_sup_of X,L or "\/" (X,L) in the carrier of (Image c) )
assume A5:
X <> {}
; ( not ex_sup_of X,L or "\/" (X,L) in the carrier of (Image c) )
assume
ex_sup_of X,L
; "\/" (X,L) in the carrier of (Image c)
A6:
inclusion c preserves_sup_of X
by A4, A5;
ex_sup_of X, Image c
by YELLOW_0:17;
then sup ((inclusion c) .: X) =
(inclusion c) . (sup X)
by A6
.=
sup X
by FUNCT_1:18
;
then
sup ((inclusion c) .: X) in the carrier of (Image c)
;
hence
"\/" (X,L) in the carrier of (Image c)
by WAYBEL15:12; verum