let X be set ; :: thesis: for SF being Subset-Family of X holds basis_Pervin_uniformity SF is axiom_UP3
let SF be Subset-Family of X; :: thesis: basis_Pervin_uniformity SF is axiom_UP3
for B1 being Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF ex B2 being Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF st B2 [*] B2 c= B1
proof
let B1 be Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF; :: thesis: ex B2 being Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF st B2 [*] B2 c= B1
B1 in FinMeetCl (subbasis_Pervin_uniformity SF) ;
then consider Y being Subset-Family of [:X,X:] such that
A1: Y c= subbasis_Pervin_uniformity SF and
Y is finite and
A2: B1 = Intersect Y by CANTOR_1:def 3;
per cases ( Y is empty or not Y is empty ) ;
suppose Y is empty ; :: thesis: ex B2 being Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF st B2 [*] B2 c= B1
then A3: B1 = [:X,X:] by A2, SETFAM_1:def 9;
take B1 ; :: thesis: B1 [*] B1 c= B1
thus B1 [*] B1 c= B1 by A3; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose A4: not Y is empty ; :: thesis: ex B2 being Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF st B2 [*] B2 c= B1
then A5: B1 = meet Y by A2, SETFAM_1:def 9;
reconsider B2 = B1 as Element of basis_Pervin_uniformity SF ;
take B2 ; :: thesis: B2 [*] B2 c= B1
B2 * B2 c= B1
proof
let t be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not t in B2 * B2 or t in B1 )
assume A6: t in B2 * B2 ; :: thesis: t in B1
then consider a, b being object such that
A10: t = [a,b] by RELAT_1:def 1;
consider c being object such that
A11: [a,c] in B1 and
A12: [c,b] in B1 by A6, A10, RELAT_1:def 8;
t in B1
proof end;
hence t in B1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence B2 [*] B2 c= B1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence basis_Pervin_uniformity SF is axiom_UP3 ; :: thesis: verum