let T be TopSpace; ( T is T_1 & T is Lindelof implies ( ( T is finite-ind & ind T <= 0 ) iff for A, B being closed Subset of T st A misses B holds
{} T separates A,B ) )
assume that
A1:
T is T_1
and
A2:
T is Lindelof
; ( ( T is finite-ind & ind T <= 0 ) iff for A, B being closed Subset of T st A misses B holds
{} T separates A,B )
hereby ( ( for A, B being closed Subset of T st A misses B holds
{} T separates A,B ) implies ( T is finite-ind & ind T <= 0 ) )
assume A3:
(
T is
finite-ind &
ind T <= 0 )
;
for A, B being closed Subset of T st A misses B holds
{} T separates A,Blet A,
B be
closed Subset of
T;
( A misses B implies {} T separates A,B )assume
A misses B
;
{} T separates A,Bthen consider A9,
B9 being
closed Subset of
T such that A4:
A9 misses B9
and A5:
A9 \/ B9 = [#] T
and A6:
(
A c= A9 &
B c= B9 )
by A2, A3, Th34;
A7:
A9 ` = B9
by A4, A5, PRE_TOPC:5;
(
(A9 \/ B9) ` = (({} T) `) ` &
A9 = B9 ` )
by A4, A5, PRE_TOPC:5;
hence
{} T separates A,
B
by A4, A6, A7, METRIZTS:def 3;
verum
end;
assume A8:
for A, B being closed Subset of T st A misses B holds
{} T separates A,B
; ( T is finite-ind & ind T <= 0 )
for A, B being closed Subset of T st A misses B holds
ex A9, B9 being closed Subset of T st
( A9 misses B9 & A9 \/ B9 = [#] T & A c= A9 & B c= B9 )
hence
( T is finite-ind & ind T <= 0 )
by A1, Th32; verum