let X be non empty TopSpace; :: thesis: for X0, X1, X2 being non empty SubSpace of X holds
( ( X1 union X2 misses X0 implies ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) ) & ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 implies X1 union X2 misses X0 ) & ( X0 misses X1 union X2 implies ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) ) & ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 implies X0 misses X1 union X2 ) )

let X0, X1, X2 be non empty SubSpace of X; :: thesis: ( ( X1 union X2 misses X0 implies ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) ) & ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 implies X1 union X2 misses X0 ) & ( X0 misses X1 union X2 implies ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) ) & ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 implies X0 misses X1 union X2 ) )
reconsider A0 = the carrier of X0 as Subset of X by TSEP_1:1;
reconsider A1 = the carrier of X1 as Subset of X by TSEP_1:1;
reconsider A2 = the carrier of X2 as Subset of X by TSEP_1:1;
A1: ( X1 union X2 misses X0 implies ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) )
proof
assume X1 union X2 misses X0 ; :: thesis: ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 )
then the carrier of (X1 union X2) misses A0 by TSEP_1:def 3;
then (A1 \/ A2) /\ A0 = {} by TSEP_1:def 2;
then A2: (A1 /\ A0) \/ (A2 /\ A0) = {} by XBOOLE_1:23;
then A3: A2 misses A0 ;
A1 /\ A0 = {} by A2;
then A1 misses A0 ;
hence ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) by A3, TSEP_1:def 3; :: thesis: verum
end;
A4: ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 implies X1 union X2 misses X0 )
proof end;
hence ( X1 union X2 misses X0 iff ( X1 misses X0 & X2 misses X0 ) ) by A1; :: thesis: ( X0 misses X1 union X2 iff ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) )
thus ( X0 misses X1 union X2 iff ( X0 misses X1 & X0 misses X2 ) ) by A1, A4; :: thesis: verum