let x, Min be Surreal; :: thesis: ( ( for y being Surreal st y in R_ x holds
Min <= y ) & Min in R_ x implies ( [(L_ x),{Min}] is Surreal & ( for y being Surreal st y = [(L_ x),{Min}] holds
( y == x & born y c= born x ) ) ) )

assume that
A1: for y being Surreal st y in R_ x holds
Min <= y and
A2: Min in R_ x ; :: thesis: ( [(L_ x),{Min}] is Surreal & ( for y being Surreal st y = [(L_ x),{Min}] holds
( y == x & born y c= born x ) ) )

A3: L_ x << R_ x by SURREAL0:45;
A4: L_ x << {Min}
proof
let l be Surreal; :: according to SURREAL0:def 20 :: thesis: for b1 being set holds
( not l in L_ x or not b1 in {Min} or not l >= b1 )

let r be Surreal; :: thesis: ( not l in L_ x or not r in {Min} or not l >= r )
assume A5: ( l in L_ x & r in {Min} ) ; :: thesis: not l >= r
r = Min by A5, TARSKI:def 1;
hence not l >= r by A3, A5, A2; :: thesis: verum
end;
for o being object st o in (L_ x) \/ {Min} holds
ex O being Ordinal st
( O in born x & o in Day O )
proof
let o be object ; :: thesis: ( o in (L_ x) \/ {Min} implies ex O being Ordinal st
( O in born x & o in Day O ) )

assume A6: o in (L_ x) \/ {Min} ; :: thesis: ex O being Ordinal st
( O in born x & o in Day O )

( o = Min or o in L_ x ) by A6, ZFMISC_1:136;
then A7: o in (L_ x) \/ (R_ x) by A2, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
reconsider o = o as Surreal by SURREAL0:def 16, A6;
take born o ; :: thesis: ( born o in born x & o in Day (born o) )
thus ( born o in born x & o in Day (born o) ) by A7, Th1, SURREAL0:def 18; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A8: [(L_ x),{Min}] in Day (born x) by A4, SURREAL0:46;
hence [(L_ x),{Min}] is Surreal ; :: thesis: for y being Surreal st y = [(L_ x),{Min}] holds
( y == x & born y c= born x )

let y be Surreal; :: thesis: ( y = [(L_ x),{Min}] implies ( y == x & born y c= born x ) )
assume A9: y = [(L_ x),{Min}] ; :: thesis: ( y == x & born y c= born x )
A10: ( x = [(L_ x),(R_ x)] & y = [(L_ y),(R_ y)] ) ;
A11: for x1 being Surreal st x1 in L_ x holds
ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in L_ y & x1 <= y1 ) by A9;
A12: for x1 being Surreal st x1 in R_ y holds
ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in R_ x & y1 <= x1 )
proof
let x1 be Surreal; :: thesis: ( x1 in R_ y implies ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in R_ x & y1 <= x1 ) )

assume A13: x1 in R_ y ; :: thesis: ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in R_ x & y1 <= x1 )

take Min ; :: thesis: ( Min in R_ x & Min <= x1 )
thus ( Min in R_ x & Min <= x1 ) by A9, A13, A2, TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
A14: for x1 being Surreal st x1 in L_ y holds
ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in L_ x & x1 <= y1 ) by A9;
for x1 being Surreal st x1 in R_ x holds
ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in R_ y & y1 <= x1 )
proof
let x1 be Surreal; :: thesis: ( x1 in R_ x implies ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in R_ y & y1 <= x1 ) )

assume A15: x1 in R_ x ; :: thesis: ex y1 being Surreal st
( y1 in R_ y & y1 <= x1 )

take Min ; :: thesis: ( Min in R_ y & Min <= x1 )
thus ( Min in R_ y & Min <= x1 ) by A15, A1, A9, TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ( y == x & born y c= born x ) by A10, A14, SURREAL0:44, A12, A11, SURREAL0:def 18, A9, A8; :: thesis: verum