let d be Dyadic; uDyadic . (- d) = - (uDyadic . d)
defpred S1[ Nat] means for d being Dyadic st d in DYADIC $1 holds
uDyadic . (- d) = - (uDyadic . d);
A1:
S1[ 0 ]
A2:
for n being Nat st S1[n] holds
S1[n + 1]
proof
let n be
Nat;
( S1[n] implies S1[n + 1] )
assume A3:
S1[
n]
;
S1[n + 1]
let d be
Dyadic;
( d in DYADIC (n + 1) implies uDyadic . (- d) = - (uDyadic . d) )
assume A4:
d in DYADIC (n + 1)
;
uDyadic . (- d) = - (uDyadic . d)
per cases
( d in DYADIC n or not d in DYADIC n )
;
suppose
not
d in DYADIC n
;
uDyadic . (- d) = - (uDyadic . d)then
d in (DYADIC (n + 1)) \ (DYADIC n)
by A4, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then consider i being
Integer such that A5:
d = ((2 * i) + 1) / (2 |^ (n + 1))
by Th20;
set j =
- (i + 1);
(2 * (- (i + 1))) + 1
= - ((2 * i) + 1)
;
then A6:
- d = ((2 * (- (i + 1))) + 1) / (2 |^ (n + 1))
by A5, XCMPLX_1:187;
A7:
- (i / (2 |^ n)) =
(- i) / (2 |^ n)
by XCMPLX_1:187
.=
((- (i + 1)) + 1) / (2 |^ n)
;
A8:
- ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n)) = (- (i + 1)) / (2 |^ n)
by XCMPLX_1:187;
(
i / (2 |^ n) in DYADIC n &
(i + 1) / (2 |^ n) in DYADIC n )
by Def4;
then A9:
(
- (uDyadic . (i / (2 |^ n))) = uDyadic . (((- (i + 1)) + 1) / (2 |^ n)) &
- (uDyadic . ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n))) = uDyadic . ((- (i + 1)) / (2 |^ n)) )
by A3, A7, A8;
uDyadic . d = [{(uDyadic . (i / (2 |^ n)))},{(uDyadic . ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n)))}]
by A5, Def5;
then
(
L_ (uDyadic . d) = {(uDyadic . (i / (2 |^ n)))} &
R_ (uDyadic . d) = {(uDyadic . ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n)))} )
;
hence - (uDyadic . d) =
[(-- {(uDyadic . ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n)))}),(-- {(uDyadic . (i / (2 |^ n)))})]
by SURREALR:7
.=
[{(- (uDyadic . ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n))))},(-- {(uDyadic . (i / (2 |^ n)))})]
by SURREALR:21
.=
[{(- (uDyadic . ((i + 1) / (2 |^ n))))},{(- (uDyadic . (i / (2 |^ n))))}]
by SURREALR:21
.=
uDyadic . (- d)
by A9, A6, Def5
;
verum end; end;
end;
A10:
for n being Nat holds S1[n]
from NAT_1:sch 2(A1, A2);
consider i being Integer, n being Nat such that
A11:
d = i / (2 |^ n)
by Th18;
d in DYADIC n
by A11, Def4;
hence
uDyadic . (- d) = - (uDyadic . d)
by A10; verum