set D = { (divs (lamb,x,X,Inv)) where lamb is Element of Lamb : lamb in Lamb } ;
take U = union { (divs (lamb,x,X,Inv)) where lamb is Element of Lamb : lamb in Lamb } ; :: thesis: for o being object holds
( o in U iff ex lamb being object st
( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) ) )

let o be object ; :: thesis: ( o in U iff ex lamb being object st
( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) ) )

thus ( o in U implies ex lamb being object st
( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) ) ) :: thesis: ( ex lamb being object st
( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) ) implies o in U )
proof
assume o in U ; :: thesis: ex lamb being object st
( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) )

then consider d being set such that
A1: ( o in d & d in { (divs (lamb,x,X,Inv)) where lamb is Element of Lamb : lamb in Lamb } ) by TARSKI:def 4;
ex l being Element of Lamb st
( d = divs (l,x,X,Inv) & l in Lamb ) by A1;
hence ex lamb being object st
( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) ) by A1; :: thesis: verum
end;
given lamb being object such that A2: ( lamb in Lamb & o in divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) ) ; :: thesis: o in U
divs (lamb,x,X,Inv) in { (divs (lamb,x,X,Inv)) where lamb is Element of Lamb : lamb in Lamb } by A2;
hence o in U by A2, TARSKI:def 4; :: thesis: verum