now :: thesis: for a being object st a in CQC-Sub-WFF Al holds
a in dom (QSub Al)
let a be object ; :: thesis: ( a in CQC-Sub-WFF Al implies a in dom (QSub Al) )
assume a in CQC-Sub-WFF Al ; :: thesis: a in dom (QSub Al)
then consider p being Element of QC-WFF Al, Sub being CQC_Substitution of Al such that
A1: a = [p,Sub] by SUBSTUT1:8;
A2: now :: thesis: ( not p is universal implies a in dom (QSub Al) )end;
now :: thesis: ( p is universal implies a in dom (QSub Al) )end;
hence a in dom (QSub Al) by A2; :: thesis: verum
end;
then CQC-Sub-WFF Al c= dom (QSub Al) ;
then A3: dom ((QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) = CQC-Sub-WFF Al by RELAT_1:62;
rng ((QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) c= vSUB Al
proof
let b be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not b in rng ((QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) or b in vSUB Al )
assume b in rng ((QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) ; :: thesis: b in vSUB Al
then consider a being object such that
A4: ( a in dom ((QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) & ((QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) . a = b ) by FUNCT_1:def 3;
A5: (QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al) c= QSub Al by RELAT_1:59;
[a,b] in (QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al) by A4, FUNCT_1:1;
then consider p being Element of QC-WFF Al, Sub being CQC_Substitution of Al, b1 being object such that
A6: [a,b] = [[p,Sub],b1] and
A7: p,Sub PQSub b1 by A5, SUBSTUT1:def 15;
A8: now :: thesis: ( not p is universal implies b is CQC_Substitution of Al )end;
now :: thesis: ( p is universal implies b is CQC_Substitution of Al )end;
hence b in vSUB Al by A8; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence (QSub Al) | (CQC-Sub-WFF Al) is Function of (CQC-Sub-WFF Al),(vSUB Al) by A3, FUNCT_2:2; :: thesis: verum