let RLS be non empty RLSStruct ; :: thesis: for A, B being Subset-Family of RLS holds |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| = |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).|
let A, B be Subset-Family of RLS; :: thesis: |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| = |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).|
set CA = Complex_of A;
set CB = Complex_of B;
set CAB = Complex_of (A \/ B);
A1: the topology of (Complex_of A) \/ the topology of (Complex_of B) = the topology of (Complex_of (A \/ B)) by SIMPLEX0:5;
thus |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| c= |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).| :: according to XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).| c= |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).|
proof
let x be object ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| or x in |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).| )
assume x in |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| ; :: thesis: x in |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).|
then consider S being Subset of (Complex_of (A \/ B)) such that
A2: S is simplex-like and
A3: x in conv (@ S) by Def3;
A4: S in the topology of (Complex_of (A \/ B)) by A2;
per cases ( S in the topology of (Complex_of A) or S in the topology of (Complex_of B) ) by A1, A4, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
end;
( |.(Complex_of A).| c= |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| & |.(Complex_of B).| c= |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| ) by A1, Th4, XBOOLE_1:7;
hence |.(Complex_of A).| \/ |.(Complex_of B).| c= |.(Complex_of (A \/ B)).| by XBOOLE_1:8; :: thesis: verum