let X be set ; :: thesis: for v being object st 3 c= card X holds
ex v1, v2 being object st
( v1 in X & v2 in X & v1 <> v & v2 <> v & v1 <> v2 )

let v be object ; :: thesis: ( 3 c= card X implies ex v1, v2 being object st
( v1 in X & v2 in X & v1 <> v & v2 <> v & v1 <> v2 ) )

assume 3 c= card X ; :: thesis: ex v1, v2 being object st
( v1 in X & v2 in X & v1 <> v & v2 <> v & v1 <> v2 )

then consider x, y, z being object such that
A1: x in X and
A2: y in X and
A3: z in X and
A4: x <> y and
A5: x <> z and
A6: y <> z by PENCIL_1:5;
( ( v <> x & v <> y & v <> z ) or v = x or v = y or v = z ) ;
hence ex v1, v2 being object st
( v1 in X & v2 in X & v1 <> v & v2 <> v & v1 <> v2 ) by A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6; :: thesis: verum