let G be with_finite_clique# SimpleGraph; :: thesis: ( clique# G = 1 implies for D being finite Clique of (Mycielskian G) holds order D <= 2 )
assume A1: clique# G = 1 ; :: thesis: for D being finite Clique of (Mycielskian G) holds order D <= 2
set uG = union G;
set MG = Mycielskian G;
set uMG = union (Mycielskian G);
let D be finite Clique of (Mycielskian G); :: thesis: order D <= 2
set uD = union D;
assume A2: order D > 2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A3: order D >= 2 + 1 by NAT_1:13;
not union D is empty by A2;
then consider v being object such that
A4: v in union D ;
A5: v <> union G by A4, A3, Th105;
Segm 3 c= Segm (order D) by A3, NAT_1:39;
then consider v1, v2 being object such that
A6: v1 in union D and
v2 in union D and
A7: v1 <> v and
v2 <> v and
v1 <> v2 by Th5;
A8: v1 <> union G by A6, A3, Th105;
set e = {v,v1};
{v,v1} in D by A4, A6, Th53;
then A9: {v,v1} in Edges (Mycielskian G) by A7, Th12;
per cases ( {v,v1} in Edges G or ex x, y being Element of union G st
( {v,v1} = {x,[y,(union G)]} & {x,y} in Edges G ) or ex y being Element of union G st
( {v,v1} = {(union G),[y,(union G)]} & y in union G ) ) by A9, Th90;
suppose {v,v1} in Edges G ; :: thesis: contradiction
end;
suppose ex x, y being Element of union G st
( {v,v1} = {x,[y,(union G)]} & {x,y} in Edges G ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider x, y being Element of union G such that
{v,v1} = {x,[y,(union G)]} and
A10: {x,y} in Edges G ;
thus contradiction by A1, A10, Th57; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose ex y being Element of union G st
( {v,v1} = {(union G),[y,(union G)]} & y in union G ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider y being Element of union G such that
A11: {v,v1} = {(union G),[y,(union G)]} and
y in union G ;
thus contradiction by A5, A8, A11, ZFMISC_1:6; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;