let G be SimpleGraph; :: thesis: for C being finite Clique of (Mycielskian G) st 3 <= order C holds
for v being Vertex of C holds v <> union G

let C be finite Clique of (Mycielskian G); :: thesis: ( 3 <= order C implies for v being Vertex of C holds v <> union G )
assume A1: 3 <= order C ; :: thesis: for v being Vertex of C holds v <> union G
set MG = Mycielskian G;
let v be Vertex of C; :: thesis: v <> union G
assume A2: v = union G ; :: thesis: contradiction
Segm 3 c= Segm (order C) by A1, NAT_1:39;
then consider v1, v2 being object such that
A3: v1 in Vertices C and
A4: v2 in Vertices C and
A5: v1 <> v and
A6: v2 <> v and
A7: v1 <> v2 by Th5;
A8: {v,v1} in C by A3, Th53;
A9: {v,v2} in C by A4, Th53;
A10: {v,v1} in Edges (Mycielskian G) by A8, A5, Th12;
A11: {v,v2} in Edges (Mycielskian G) by A6, A9, Th12;
consider x1 being object such that
x1 in union G and
A12: v1 = [x1,(union G)] by A2, A10, Th94;
consider x2 being object such that
x2 in union G and
A13: v2 = [x2,(union G)] by A2, A11, Th94;
{v1,v2} in C by A3, A4, Th53;
hence contradiction by A12, A13, A7, Th98; :: thesis: verum