let A be non degenerated commutative Ring; :: thesis: for S being non empty multiplicatively-closed without_zero Subset of A st not 0. A in S holds
ker (canHom S) c= ZeroDiv_Set A

let S be non empty multiplicatively-closed without_zero Subset of A; :: thesis: ( not 0. A in S implies ker (canHom S) c= ZeroDiv_Set A )
assume A1: not 0. A in S ; :: thesis: ker (canHom S) c= ZeroDiv_Set A
for o being object st o in ker (canHom S) holds
o in ZeroDiv_Set A
proof
let o be object ; :: thesis: ( o in ker (canHom S) implies o in ZeroDiv_Set A )
assume o in ker (canHom S) ; :: thesis: o in ZeroDiv_Set A
then consider v1 being Element of A such that
A3: v1 = o and
A4: (canHom S) . v1 = 0. (S ~ A) ;
1. A in S by C0SP1:def 4;
then reconsider w = [v1,(1. A)] as Element of Frac S by Def3;
Class ((EqRel S),(0. (A,S))) = (canHom S) . v1 by A4, Def6
.= Class ((EqRel S),((frac1 S) . v1)) by Def7
.= Class ((EqRel S),w) by Def4 ;
then 0. (A,S),w Fr_Eq S by Th26;
then consider t1 being Element of A such that
A5: t1 in S and
A6: ((((0. (A,S)) `1) * (w `2)) - ((w `1) * ((0. (A,S)) `2))) * t1 = 0. A ;
A7: 0. A = ((- (1. A)) * v1) * t1 by A6, VECTSP_2:29
.= (- (1. A)) * (v1 * t1) by GROUP_1:def 3
.= - (v1 * t1) by VECTSP_2:29 ;
A8: 0. A = - (- (v1 * t1)) by A7
.= v1 * t1 ;
v1 is zero_divisible by A1, A5, A8;
hence o in ZeroDiv_Set A by A3; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ker (canHom S) c= ZeroDiv_Set A ; :: thesis: verum