let z be Complex; for X being complex-membered set st z <> 1 & z <> - 1 & not 0 in X holds
multRel (X,z) is asymmetric
let X be complex-membered set ; ( z <> 1 & z <> - 1 & not 0 in X implies multRel (X,z) is asymmetric )
assume A0:
( z <> 1 & z <> - 1 & not 0 in X )
; multRel (X,z) is asymmetric
now for x, y being object st x in field (multRel (X,z)) & y in field (multRel (X,z)) & [x,y] in multRel (X,z) holds
not [y,x] in multRel (X,z)let x,
y be
object ;
( x in field (multRel (X,z)) & y in field (multRel (X,z)) & [x,y] in multRel (X,z) implies not [y,x] in multRel (X,z) )reconsider a =
x,
b =
y as
set by TARSKI:1;
assume A1:
(
x in field (multRel (X,z)) &
y in field (multRel (X,z)) &
[x,y] in multRel (
X,
z) &
[y,x] in multRel (
X,
z) )
;
contradictionthen A2:
(
a in X &
b in X )
by MMLQUER2:4;
then reconsider a =
a,
b =
b as
Complex ;
(
b = z * a &
a = z * b )
by A1, Th42;
then
b = z * (z * b)
;
then b * (b ") =
((z * z) * b) * (b ")
.=
(z * z) * (b * (b "))
;
then
1
= (z * z) * (b * (b "))
by A0, A2, XCMPLX_0:def 7;
then
1
= (z * z) * 1
by A0, A2, XCMPLX_0:def 7;
hence
contradiction
by A0, XCMPLX_1:182;
verum end;
hence
multRel (X,z) is asymmetric
by RELAT_2:def 13, RELAT_2:def 5; verum