let A be QC-alphabet ; :: thesis: for s, t, u being QC-symbol of A st s <= t & t <= u holds
s <= u

let s, t, u be QC-symbol of A; :: thesis: ( s <= t & t <= u implies s <= u )
set R = the Relation of A;
the Relation of A well_orders (QC-symbols A) \ NAT by Def32;
then A1: the Relation of A is_transitive_in (QC-symbols A) \ NAT by WELLORD1:def 5;
assume A2: ( s <= t & t <= u ) ; :: thesis: s <= u
per cases ( s in NAT or not s in NAT ) ;
suppose A3: s in NAT ; :: thesis: s <= u
then A4: t in NAT by A2, Def33;
then A5: u in NAT by A2, Def33;
consider m, n being Nat such that
A6: ( s = m & t = n & m <= n ) by A2, A3, A4, Def33;
consider k, j being Nat such that
A7: ( t = k & u = j & k <= j ) by A2, A4, A5, Def33;
m <= j by A6, A7, XXREAL_0:2;
hence s <= u by A6, A7, Def33, A3, A5; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose A8: not s in NAT ; :: thesis: s <= u
end;
end;