let A be QC-alphabet ; for s, t, u being QC-symbol of A st s <= t & t <= u holds
s <= u
let s, t, u be QC-symbol of A; ( s <= t & t <= u implies s <= u )
set R = the Relation of A;
the Relation of A well_orders (QC-symbols A) \ NAT
by Def32;
then A1:
the Relation of A is_transitive_in (QC-symbols A) \ NAT
by WELLORD1:def 5;
assume A2:
( s <= t & t <= u )
; s <= u
per cases
( s in NAT or not s in NAT )
;
suppose A3:
s in NAT
;
s <= uthen A4:
t in NAT
by A2, Def33;
then A5:
u in NAT
by A2, Def33;
consider m,
n being
Nat such that A6:
(
s = m &
t = n &
m <= n )
by A2, A3, A4, Def33;
consider k,
j being
Nat such that A7:
(
t = k &
u = j &
k <= j )
by A2, A4, A5, Def33;
m <= j
by A6, A7, XXREAL_0:2;
hence
s <= u
by A6, A7, Def33, A3, A5;
verum end; suppose A8:
not
s in NAT
;
s <= uper cases
( t in NAT or not t in NAT )
;
suppose A9:
not
t in NAT
;
s <= uper cases
( u in NAT or not u in NAT )
;
suppose A10:
not
u in NAT
;
s <= uthen A11:
(
s in (QC-symbols A) \ NAT &
t in (QC-symbols A) \ NAT &
u in (QC-symbols A) \ NAT )
by A8, A9, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
(
[s,t] in the
Relation of
A &
[t,u] in the
Relation of
A )
by A2, A8, A9, A10, Def33;
then
[s,u] in the
Relation of
A
by A1, A11, RELAT_2:def 8;
hence
s <= u
by A8, A10, Def33;
verum end; end; end; end; end; end;