set A = the Axioms of P;
set Obj = the carrier of P;
set R = the Rules of P;
set O = Omit (P,F);
let B be Subset of P; PROOFS_1:def 29 ( B in Omit (P,F) iff for S being finite Subset of B holds S in Omit (P,F) )
thus
( B in Omit (P,F) implies for S being finite Subset of B holds S in Omit (P,F) )
( ( for S being finite Subset of B holds S in Omit (P,F) ) implies B in Omit (P,F) )
assume A10:
for S being finite Subset of B holds S in Omit (P,F)
; B in Omit (P,F)
assume
not B in Omit (P,F)
; contradiction
then A11:
not B is F -omitting
;
for a being object st a in F holds
the Axioms of P \/ B, the Rules of P |- a
then consider S1 being Formula-finset such that
A12:
F c= S1
and
A13:
S1 is the Axioms of P \/ B, the Rules of P -derivable
by Th47;
set S2 = B /\ S1;
( ( the Axioms of P \/ B) /\ S1 = ( the Axioms of P /\ S1) \/ (B /\ S1) & the Axioms of P /\ S1 c= the Axioms of P )
by XBOOLE_1:17, XBOOLE_1:23;
then
S1 is the Axioms of P \/ (B /\ S1), the Rules of P -derivable
by A13, Th48, XBOOLE_1:9;
then
for a being object st a in F holds
the Axioms of P \/ (B /\ S1), the Rules of P |- a
by A12;
then
for a being object st a in F holds
P \/ (B /\ S1) |- a
;
then
not B /\ S1 is F -omitting
;
then A15:
not B /\ S1 in Omit (P,F)
by Def17;
B /\ S1 is finite Subset of B
by XBOOLE_1:17;
hence
contradiction
by A10, A15; verum