let IPP be IncProjSp; :: thesis: for A, B being LINE of IPP st A <> B holds
ex a, b being POINT of IPP st
( a on A & not a on B & b on B & not b on A )

let A, B be LINE of IPP; :: thesis: ( A <> B implies ex a, b being POINT of IPP st
( a on A & not a on B & b on B & not b on A ) )

consider a, b, d being POINT of IPP such that
A1: a <> b and
b <> d and
d <> a and
A2: ( a on A & b on A ) and
d on A by INCPROJ:def 7;
consider r, s, t being POINT of IPP such that
A3: r <> s and
s <> t and
t <> r and
A4: ( r on B & s on B ) and
t on B by INCPROJ:def 7;
assume A5: A <> B ; :: thesis: ex a, b being POINT of IPP st
( a on A & not a on B & b on B & not b on A )

then A6: ( not r on A or not s on A ) by A3, A4, INCPROJ:def 4;
( not a on B or not b on B ) by A5, A1, A2, INCPROJ:def 4;
hence ex a, b being POINT of IPP st
( a on A & not a on B & b on B & not b on A ) by A2, A4, A6; :: thesis: verum