let B be Polish-arity-function; for J being Polish-ext-set of B
for a being object st a in Polish-ext-complement (B,J) holds
( a in J & a in Polish-ext-domain (B,J) & not a in dom B )
let J be Polish-ext-set of B; for a being object st a in Polish-ext-complement (B,J) holds
( a in J & a in Polish-ext-domain (B,J) & not a in dom B )
let a be object ; ( a in Polish-ext-complement (B,J) implies ( a in J & a in Polish-ext-domain (B,J) & not a in dom B ) )
set T = dom B;
assume A2:
a in Polish-ext-complement (B,J)
; ( a in J & a in Polish-ext-domain (B,J) & not a in dom B )
then consider p being Element of J such that
A3:
a = p
and
A4:
not p is dom B -headed
;
thus
a in J
by A3; ( a in Polish-ext-domain (B,J) & not a in dom B )
thus
a in Polish-ext-domain (B,J)
by A2, XBOOLE_0:def 3; not a in dom B
A6:
dom B is dom B -headed
by POLNOT_1:50;
assume
a in dom B
; contradiction
hence
contradiction
by A3, A4, A6; verum