let T be non empty TopSpace; :: thesis: for FX being Subset-Family of T st FX is Cover of T holds
for x being Point of T ex W being Subset of T st
( x in W & W in FX )

let FX be Subset-Family of T; :: thesis: ( FX is Cover of T implies for x being Point of T ex W being Subset of T st
( x in W & W in FX ) )

assume FX is Cover of T ; :: thesis: for x being Point of T ex W being Subset of T st
( x in W & W in FX )

then A1: union FX = [#] T by SETFAM_1:45;
thus for x being Point of T ex W being Subset of T st
( x in W & W in FX ) :: thesis: verum
proof
let x be Point of T; :: thesis: ex W being Subset of T st
( x in W & W in FX )

thus ex W being Subset of T st
( x in W & W in FX ) :: thesis: verum
proof
consider W being set such that
A2: x in W and
A3: W in FX by A1, TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider W = W as Subset of T by A3;
take W ; :: thesis: ( x in W & W in FX )
thus ( x in W & W in FX ) by A2, A3; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;