{} c= Y
;
then reconsider e = {{}} as Subset-Family of Y by ZFMISC_1:31;
set a = INTERSECTION (PA,PB);
for z being object st z in INTERSECTION (PA,PB) holds
z in bool Y
then reconsider a = INTERSECTION (PA,PB) as Subset-Family of Y by TARSKI:def 3;
reconsider ia = a \ e as Subset-Family of Y ;
A1:
( union PA = Y & union PB = Y )
by EQREL_1:def 4;
A2: union ia =
union (INTERSECTION (PA,PB))
by Th2
.=
(union PA) /\ (union PB)
by SETFAM_1:28
.=
Y
by A1
;
for A being Subset of Y st A in ia holds
( A <> {} & ( for B being Subset of Y holds
( not B in ia or A = B or A misses B ) ) )
proof
let A be
Subset of
Y;
( A in ia implies ( A <> {} & ( for B being Subset of Y holds
( not B in ia or A = B or A misses B ) ) ) )
assume A3:
A in ia
;
( A <> {} & ( for B being Subset of Y holds
( not B in ia or A = B or A misses B ) ) )
then A4:
not
A in {{}}
by XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A5:
A in INTERSECTION (
PA,
PB)
by A3, XBOOLE_0:def 5;
for
B being
Subset of
Y holds
( not
B in ia or
A = B or
A misses B )
proof
A6:
for
m,
n,
o,
p being
set holds
(m /\ n) /\ (o /\ p) = m /\ ((n /\ o) /\ p)
let B be
Subset of
Y;
( not B in ia or A = B or A misses B )
assume
B in ia
;
( A = B or A misses B )
then
B in INTERSECTION (
PA,
PB)
by XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then consider M,
N being
set such that A7:
(
M in PA &
N in PB )
and A8:
B = M /\ N
by SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider S,
T being
set such that A9:
(
S in PA &
T in PB )
and A10:
A = S /\ T
by A5, SETFAM_1:def 5;
(
M /\ N = S /\ T or not
M = S or not
N = T )
;
then
(
M /\ N = S /\ T or
M misses S or
N misses T )
by A7, A9, EQREL_1:def 4;
then A11:
(
M /\ N = S /\ T or
M /\ S = {} or
N /\ T = {} )
by XBOOLE_0:def 7;
(M /\ S) /\ (N /\ T) =
M /\ ((S /\ N) /\ T)
by A6
.=
(M /\ N) /\ (S /\ T)
by A6
;
hence
(
A = B or
A misses B )
by A8, A10, A11, XBOOLE_0:def 7;
verum
end;
hence
(
A <> {} & ( for
B being
Subset of
Y holds
( not
B in ia or
A = B or
A misses B ) ) )
by A4, TARSKI:def 1;
verum
end;
hence
(INTERSECTION (PA,PB)) \ {{}} is a_partition of Y
by A2, EQREL_1:def 4; verum