let a, b be Ordinal; for n being Nat st a in b holds
n *^ (exp (omega,a)) in exp (omega,b)
let n be Nat; ( a in b implies n *^ (exp (omega,a)) in exp (omega,b) )
assume
a in b
; n *^ (exp (omega,a)) in exp (omega,b)
then
succ a c= b
by ORDINAL1:21;
then A1:
exp (omega,(succ a)) c= exp (omega,b)
by ORDINAL4:27;
A2:
exp (omega,(succ a)) = omega *^ (exp (omega,a))
by ORDINAL2:44;
n in omega
by ORDINAL1:def 12;
then
n *^ (exp (omega,a)) in omega *^ (exp (omega,a))
by ORDINAL3:19, ORDINAL4:22;
hence
n *^ (exp (omega,a)) in exp (omega,b)
by A1, A2; verum