let A, C be Ordinal; ( A <> {} & A is limit_ordinal implies for fi being Ordinal-Sequence st dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp (C,B) ) holds
exp (C,A) is_limes_of fi )
assume that
A1:
A <> {}
and
A2:
A is limit_ordinal
; for fi being Ordinal-Sequence st dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp (C,B) ) holds
exp (C,A) is_limes_of fi
consider psi being Ordinal-Sequence such that
A3:
dom psi = A
and
A4:
for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
psi . B = exp (C,B)
and
A5:
ex D being Ordinal st D is_limes_of psi
by A1, A2, Lm8;
let fi be Ordinal-Sequence; ( dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp (C,B) ) implies exp (C,A) is_limes_of fi )
assume that
A6:
dom fi = A
and
A7:
for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp (C,B)
; exp (C,A) is_limes_of fi
then
fi = psi
by A6, A3, FUNCT_1:2;
then consider D being Ordinal such that
A9:
D is_limes_of fi
by A5;
D =
lim fi
by A9, ORDINAL2:def 10
.=
exp (C,A)
by A1, A2, A6, A7, ORDINAL2:45
;
hence
exp (C,A) is_limes_of fi
by A9; verum