let A be non empty Poset; :: thesis: for C being Chain of A holds the InternalRel of A |_2 C is being_linear-order
let C be Chain of A; :: thesis: the InternalRel of A |_2 C is being_linear-order
set P = the InternalRel of A |_2 C;
A1: the InternalRel of A |_2 C is_connected_in C
proof
let x, y be object ; :: according to RELAT_2:def 6 :: thesis: ( not x in C or not y in C or x = y or [x,y] in the InternalRel of A |_2 C or [y,x] in the InternalRel of A |_2 C )
assume A2: ( x in C & y in C ) ; :: thesis: ( x = y or [x,y] in the InternalRel of A |_2 C or [y,x] in the InternalRel of A |_2 C )
then A3: ( [x,y] in [:C,C:] & [y,x] in [:C,C:] ) by ZFMISC_1:87;
the InternalRel of A is_strongly_connected_in C by Def7;
then ( [x,y] in the InternalRel of A or [y,x] in the InternalRel of A ) by A2;
hence ( x = y or [x,y] in the InternalRel of A |_2 C or [y,x] in the InternalRel of A |_2 C ) by A3, XBOOLE_0:def 4; :: thesis: verum
end;
the InternalRel of A is being_partial-order ;
then the InternalRel of A |_2 C is being_partial-order by ORDERS_1:26;
hence ( the InternalRel of A |_2 C is reflexive & the InternalRel of A |_2 C is transitive & the InternalRel of A |_2 C is antisymmetric ) ; :: according to ORDERS_1:def 6 :: thesis: the InternalRel of A |_2 C is connected
C = field ( the InternalRel of A |_2 C) by Th46;
hence the InternalRel of A |_2 C is connected by A1; :: thesis: verum