let n1, m1, n2, m2 be Nat; ( n1 + m1 <= n2 implies primeNumbers (n1,m1) misses primeNumbers (n2,m2) )
assume A1:
n1 + m1 <= n2
; primeNumbers (n1,m1) misses primeNumbers (n2,m2)
( primeNumbers (n1,m1) = (seq (n1,m1)) /\ SetPrimes & primeNumbers (n2,m2) = (seq (n2,m2)) /\ SetPrimes )
by NUMBER14:def 17;
hence
primeNumbers (n1,m1) misses primeNumbers (n2,m2)
by A1, Th75, XBOOLE_1:76; verum