let n1, m1, n2, m2 be Nat; ( n1 + m1 <= n2 implies seq (n1,m1) misses seq (n2,m2) )
assume A1:
n1 + m1 <= n2
; seq (n1,m1) misses seq (n2,m2)
assume
seq (n1,m1) meets seq (n2,m2)
; contradiction
then consider x being object such that
A2:
( x in seq (n1,m1) & x in seq (n2,m2) )
by XBOOLE_0:3;
reconsider x = x as Nat by A2;
( n2 < x & x <= n1 + m1 )
by A2, Th73;
hence
contradiction
by A1, XXREAL_0:2; verum