let k be Nat; :: thesis: ( k,1 are_congruent_mod ((2 |^ 32) - 1) * 641 & k, - 1 are_congruent_mod 6700417 & k > 6700417 implies for n being positive Nat holds
( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) ) )

assume that
A1: k,1 are_congruent_mod ((2 |^ 32) - 1) * 641 and
A2: k, - 1 are_congruent_mod 6700417 and
A3: k > 6700417 ; :: thesis: for n being positive Nat holds
( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) )

let n be positive Nat; :: thesis: ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) )
consider m, t being Nat such that
A4: n = (2 |^ m) * ((2 * t) + 1) by NAGATA_2:1;
A5: (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 >= 1 + 1 by A3, NAT_1:14, XREAL_1:6;
A6: Fermat m <> 1 by PEPIN:55;
per cases ( m <= 4 or m > 4 ) ;
suppose A7: m <= 4 ; :: thesis: ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) )
A8: ( 2 |^ n,2 |^ n are_congruent_mod (2 |^ 32) - 1 & 1,1 are_congruent_mod (2 |^ 32) - 1 ) by INT_1:11;
k,1 are_congruent_mod (2 |^ 32) - 1 by A1, INT_1:20;
then A9: k * (2 |^ n),1 * (2 |^ n) are_congruent_mod (2 |^ 32) - 1 by A8, INT_1:18;
Fermat m divides (2 |^ 32) - 1 by A7, Lm2;
then A10: Fermat m divides ((k * (2 |^ n)) + 1) - ((2 |^ n) + 1) by A9, INT_2:9;
Fermat m divides (2 |^ n) + 1 by A4, Lm1;
then A11: Fermat m divides (((k * (2 |^ n)) + 1) - ((2 |^ n) + 1)) + ((2 |^ n) + 1) by A10, WSIERP_1:4;
2 |^ n >= 1 by NAT_1:14;
then k * (2 |^ n) >= 1 * 6700417 by A3, XREAL_1:66;
then A12: (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 > 6700417 by NAT_1:13;
( 6700417 > Fermat 4 & Fermat 4 >= Fermat m ) by A7, NUMBER09:31, Th28;
then 6700417 > Fermat m by XXREAL_0:2;
then not (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is prime by A6, A11, A12;
hence ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) ) by A7, A11, A5, NUMBER02:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose m > 4 ; :: thesis: ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) )
then m >= 4 + 1 by NAT_1:13;
per cases then ( m = 5 or m > 5 ) by XXREAL_0:1;
suppose A13: m = 5 ; :: thesis: ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) )
A14: ( 2 |^ n,2 |^ n are_congruent_mod 641 & 1,1 are_congruent_mod 641 ) by INT_1:11;
k,1 are_congruent_mod 641 by A1, INT_1:20;
then A15: k * (2 |^ n),1 * (2 |^ n) are_congruent_mod 641 by A14, INT_1:18;
( 641 divides Fermat m & Fermat m divides (2 |^ n) + 1 ) by A13, A4, Lm1, NAT_6:45;
then 641 divides (2 |^ n) + 1 by INT_2:9;
then A16: 641 divides (((k * (2 |^ n)) + 1) - ((2 |^ n) + 1)) + ((2 |^ n) + 1) by A15, WSIERP_1:4;
2 |^ n >= 1 by NAT_1:14;
then k * (2 |^ n) >= 1 * 6700417 by A3, XREAL_1:66;
then (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 > 6700417 by NAT_1:13;
then (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 > 641 by XXREAL_0:2;
then not (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is prime by A16;
hence ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) ) by A16, A5, NUMBER02:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose m > 5 ; :: thesis: ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) )
then m >= 5 + 1 by NAT_1:13;
then ( 2 |^ 6 divides 2 |^ m & 2 |^ m divides n ) by A4, NEWTON:89;
then consider h being Nat such that
A17: n = (2 |^ 6) * h by INT_2:9, NAT_D:def 3;
A18: ( 2 |^ n,2 |^ n are_congruent_mod 6700417 & 1,1 are_congruent_mod 6700417 ) by INT_1:11;
k * (2 |^ n),(- 1) * (2 |^ n) are_congruent_mod 6700417 by A2, A18, INT_1:18;
then A19: 6700417 divides ((k * (2 |^ n)) + 1) + ((2 |^ n) - 1) ;
6700417 divides Fermat 5 by Th28;
then A20: 6700417 divides (2 |^ (2 |^ 5)) + 1 by PEPIN:def 3;
(2 |^ (2 |^ 5)) |^ (2 * 1) = 2 |^ ((2 |^ 5) * 2) by NEWTON:9
.= 2 |^ (2 |^ (5 + 1)) by NEWTON:6 ;
then (2 |^ (2 |^ 5)) + 1 divides (2 |^ (2 |^ 6)) - (1 |^ (2 * 1)) by NEWTON01:36;
then A21: 6700417 divides (2 |^ (2 |^ 6)) - 1 by A20, INT_2:9;
(2 |^ (2 |^ 6)) |^ h = 2 |^ n by A17, NEWTON:9;
then (2 |^ (2 |^ 6)) - 1 divides (2 |^ n) - (1 |^ h) by NEWTON01:33;
then A22: 6700417 divides (2 |^ n) - (1 |^ h) by A21, INT_2:9;
2 |^ n >= 1 by NAT_1:14;
then k * (2 |^ n) >= 1 * 6700417 by A3, XREAL_1:66;
then (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 > 6700417 by NAT_1:13;
then not (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is prime by A22, A19, INT_2:1;
hence ( (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 is composite & ( not not Fermat 0 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 & ... & not Fermat 4 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 641 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 or 6700417 divides (k * (2 |^ n)) + 1 ) ) by A5, A22, A19, INT_2:1, NUMBER02:def 1; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
end;