let p, q be Prime; for n being Nat holds
( not (p * (p + 1)) + (q * (q + 1)) = n * (n + 1) or ( p = 2 & q = 2 & n = 3 ) or ( p = 5 & q = 3 & n = 6 ) or ( p = 3 & q = 5 & n = 6 ) )
let n be Nat; ( not (p * (p + 1)) + (q * (q + 1)) = n * (n + 1) or ( p = 2 & q = 2 & n = 3 ) or ( p = 5 & q = 3 & n = 6 ) or ( p = 3 & q = 5 & n = 6 ) )
assume
(p * (p + 1)) + (q * (q + 1)) = n * (n + 1)
; ( ( p = 2 & q = 2 & n = 3 ) or ( p = 5 & q = 3 & n = 6 ) or ( p = 3 & q = 5 & n = 6 ) )
then A1:
p * (p + 1) = (n - q) * ((n + q) + 1)
;
A2:
now not n <= qassume
n <= q
;
contradictionthen
n - q <= q - q
by XREAL_1:9;
then
n - q <= 0
;
hence
contradiction
by A1;
verum end;
then A3:
n - q > q - q
by XREAL_1:9;
A4:
n - q in NAT
by A2, INT_1:5;
p divides p * (p + 1)
;