let A be set ; for b being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A
for B being Element of Fin (DISJOINT_PAIRS A) st b in B holds
ex c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st
( c c= b & c in mi B )
let b be Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A; for B being Element of Fin (DISJOINT_PAIRS A) st b in B holds
ex c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st
( c c= b & c in mi B )
let B be Element of Fin (DISJOINT_PAIRS A); ( b in B implies ex c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st
( c c= b & c in mi B ) )
assume A1:
b in B
; ex c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st
( c c= b & c in mi B )
defpred S1[ Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A, Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A] means $1 c= $2;
A2:
for a being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A holds S1[a,a]
;
A3:
for a, b, c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st S1[a,b] & S1[b,c] holds
S1[a,c]
by Th2;
for a being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st a in B holds
ex b being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st
( b in B & S1[b,a] & ( for c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st c in B & S1[c,b] holds
S1[b,c] ) )
from FRAENKEL:sch 23(A2, A3);
then consider c being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A such that
A4:
c in B
and
A5:
c c= b
and
A6:
for a being Element of DISJOINT_PAIRS A st a in B & a c= c holds
c c= a
by A1;
take
c
; ( c c= b & c in mi B )
thus
c c= b
by A5; c in mi B
hence
c in mi B
by A4, Th39; verum