let E, F, G be RealNormSpace; :: thesis: for L being Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators ([:E,F:],G)) ex L1 being Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (E,G)) ex L2 being Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (F,G)) st
( ( for x being Point of E
for y being Point of F holds L . [x,y] = (L1 . x) + (L2 . y) ) & ( for x being Point of E holds L1 . x = L . [x,(0. F)] ) & ( for y being Point of F holds L2 . y = L . [(0. E),y] ) & ||.L.|| <= ||.L1.|| + ||.L2.|| & ||.L1.|| <= ||.L.|| & ||.L2.|| <= ||.L.|| )

let LP be Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators ([:E,F:],G)); :: thesis: ex L1 being Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (E,G)) ex L2 being Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (F,G)) st
( ( for x being Point of E
for y being Point of F holds LP . [x,y] = (L1 . x) + (L2 . y) ) & ( for x being Point of E holds L1 . x = LP . [x,(0. F)] ) & ( for y being Point of F holds L2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y] ) & ||.LP.|| <= ||.L1.|| + ||.L2.|| & ||.L1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.L2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )

reconsider L = LP as Lipschitzian LinearOperator of [:E,F:],G by LOPBAN_1:def 9;
consider L1 being Lipschitzian LinearOperator of E,G, L2 being Lipschitzian LinearOperator of F,G such that
A1: for x being Point of E
for y being Point of F holds L . [x,y] = (L1 . x) + (L2 . y) and
A2: for x being Point of E holds L1 . x = L /. [x,(0. F)] and
A3: for y being Point of F holds L2 . y = L /. [(0. E),y] by Th2;
reconsider LP1 = L1 as Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (E,G)) by LOPBAN_1:def 9;
reconsider LP2 = L2 as Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (F,G)) by LOPBAN_1:def 9;
take LP1 ; :: thesis: ex L2 being Point of (R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (F,G)) st
( ( for x being Point of E
for y being Point of F holds LP . [x,y] = (LP1 . x) + (L2 . y) ) & ( for x being Point of E holds LP1 . x = LP . [x,(0. F)] ) & ( for y being Point of F holds L2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y] ) & ||.LP.|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.L2.|| & ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.L2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )

take LP2 ; :: thesis: ( ( for x being Point of E
for y being Point of F holds LP . [x,y] = (LP1 . x) + (LP2 . y) ) & ( for x being Point of E holds LP1 . x = LP . [x,(0. F)] ) & ( for y being Point of F holds LP2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y] ) & ||.LP.|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| & ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )

thus for x being Point of E
for y being Point of F holds LP . [x,y] = (LP1 . x) + (LP2 . y) by A1; :: thesis: ( ( for x being Point of E holds LP1 . x = LP . [x,(0. F)] ) & ( for y being Point of F holds LP2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y] ) & ||.LP.|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| & ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )
thus for x being Point of E holds LP1 . x = LP . [x,(0. F)] :: thesis: ( ( for y being Point of F holds LP2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y] ) & ||.LP.|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| & ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )
proof
let x be Point of E; :: thesis: LP1 . x = LP . [x,(0. F)]
thus LP1 . x = L /. [x,(0. F)] by A2
.= LP . [x,(0. F)] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus for y being Point of F holds LP2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y] :: thesis: ( ||.LP.|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| & ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )
proof
let y be Point of F; :: thesis: LP2 . y = LP . [(0. E),y]
thus LP2 . y = L /. [(0. E),y] by A3
.= LP . [(0. E),y] ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A7: ||.LP.|| = upper_bound (PreNorms (modetrans (LP,[:E,F:],G))) by LOPBAN_1:def 13
.= upper_bound (PreNorms L) by LOPBAN_1:29 ;
for t being Real st t in PreNorms L holds
t <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.||
proof
let t be Real; :: thesis: ( t in PreNorms L implies t <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| )
assume t in PreNorms L ; :: thesis: t <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.||
then consider w being Point of [:E,F:] such that
A8: ( t = ||.(L . w).|| & ||.w.|| <= 1 ) ;
consider x being Point of E, y being Point of F such that
A9: w = [x,y] by PRVECT_3:18;
||.x.|| <= ||.w.|| by A9, NDIFF_8:21;
then A10: ||.x.|| <= 1 by A8, XXREAL_0:2;
||.y.|| <= ||.w.|| by A9, NDIFF_8:21;
then A11: ||.y.|| <= 1 by A8, XXREAL_0:2;
L . w = (L1 . x) + (L2 . y) by A1, A9;
then A12: ||.(L . w).|| <= ||.(L1 . x).|| + ||.(L2 . y).|| by NORMSP_1:def 1;
A13: ||.(L1 . x).|| <= ||.LP1.|| * ||.x.|| by LOPBAN_1:32;
||.LP1.|| * ||.x.|| <= ||.LP1.|| * 1 by A10, XREAL_1:64;
then A14: ||.(L1 . x).|| <= ||.LP1.|| by A13, XXREAL_0:2;
A15: ||.(L2 . y).|| <= ||.LP2.|| * ||.y.|| by LOPBAN_1:32;
||.LP2.|| * ||.y.|| <= ||.LP2.|| * 1 by A11, XREAL_1:64;
then ||.(L2 . y).|| <= ||.LP2.|| by A15, XXREAL_0:2;
then ||.(L1 . x).|| + ||.(L2 . y).|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| by A14, XREAL_1:7;
hence t <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| by A8, A12, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ||.LP.|| <= ||.LP1.|| + ||.LP2.|| by A7, SEQ_4:45; :: thesis: ( ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| & ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.|| )
A17: ||.LP1.|| = upper_bound (PreNorms (modetrans (LP1,E,G))) by LOPBAN_1:def 13
.= upper_bound (PreNorms L1) by LOPBAN_1:29 ;
for t being Real st t in PreNorms L1 holds
t <= ||.LP.||
proof
let t be Real; :: thesis: ( t in PreNorms L1 implies t <= ||.LP.|| )
assume t in PreNorms L1 ; :: thesis: t <= ||.LP.||
then consider x being Point of E such that
A18: ( t = ||.(L1 . x).|| & ||.x.|| <= 1 ) ;
reconsider w = [x,(0. F)] as Point of [:E,F:] ;
A19: ||.w.|| <= 1 by A18, NDIFF_8:2;
A20: L . w = (L1 . x) + (L2 . (0. F)) by A1
.= (L1 . x) + (0. G) by LOPBAN_7:3
.= L1 . x by RLVECT_1:def 4 ;
A21: ||.(L . w).|| <= ||.LP.|| * ||.w.|| by LOPBAN_1:32;
||.LP.|| * ||.w.|| <= ||.LP.|| * 1 by A19, XREAL_1:64;
hence t <= ||.LP.|| by A18, A20, A21, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ||.LP1.|| <= ||.LP.|| by A17, SEQ_4:45; :: thesis: ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.||
A23: ||.LP2.|| = upper_bound (PreNorms (modetrans (LP2,F,G))) by LOPBAN_1:def 13
.= upper_bound (PreNorms L2) by LOPBAN_1:29 ;
for t being Real st t in PreNorms L2 holds
t <= ||.LP.||
proof
let t be Real; :: thesis: ( t in PreNorms L2 implies t <= ||.LP.|| )
assume t in PreNorms L2 ; :: thesis: t <= ||.LP.||
then consider x being Point of F such that
A24: ( t = ||.(L2 . x).|| & ||.x.|| <= 1 ) ;
reconsider w = [(0. E),x] as Point of [:E,F:] ;
A25: ||.x.|| = ||.w.|| by NDIFF_8:3;
A26: L . w = (L1 . (0. E)) + (L2 . x) by A1
.= (0. G) + (L2 . x) by LOPBAN_7:3
.= L2 . x by RLVECT_1:def 4 ;
A27: ||.(L . w).|| <= ||.LP.|| * ||.w.|| by LOPBAN_1:32;
||.LP.|| * ||.w.|| <= ||.LP.|| * 1 by A24, A25, XREAL_1:64;
hence t <= ||.LP.|| by A24, A26, A27, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ||.LP2.|| <= ||.LP.|| by A23, SEQ_4:45; :: thesis: verum