let seq1, seq2 be Function; :: thesis: ( dom seq1 = NAT & seq1 . 0 = T & ( for i being Nat holds seq1 . (i + 1) = R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (S,(modetrans (seq1 . i))) ) & dom seq2 = NAT & seq2 . 0 = T & ( for i being Nat holds seq2 . (i + 1) = R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (S,(modetrans (seq2 . i))) ) implies seq1 = seq2 )
assume that
A2: ( dom seq1 = NAT & seq1 . 0 = T & ( for n being Nat holds seq1 . (n + 1) = R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (S,(modetrans (seq1 . n))) ) ) and
A3: ( dom seq2 = NAT & seq2 . 0 = T & ( for n being Nat holds seq2 . (n + 1) = R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (S,(modetrans (seq2 . n))) ) ) ; :: thesis: seq1 = seq2
defpred S₁[ Nat] means seq1 . $1 = seq2 . $1;
A4: for k being Nat st S₁[k] holds
S₁[k + 1]

proof

let k be Nat; :: thesis: ( S₁[k] implies S₁[k + 1] )
assume S₁[k] ; :: thesis: S₁[k + 1]
then seq2 . (k + 1) = R_NormSpace_of_BoundedLinearOperators (S,(modetrans (seq1 . k))) by A3;
hence seq1 . (k + 1) = seq2 . (k + 1) by A2; :: thesis: verum

end;

A5: S₁[ 0 ] by A2, A3;
for n being Nat holds S₁[n] from NAT_1:sch 2(A5, A4);
then for n being object st n in dom seq1 holds
seq1 . n = seq2 . n by A2;
hence seq1 = seq2 by FUNCT_1:2, A2, A3; :: thesis: verum