let S be RealNormSpace; :: thesis: for R being Function of REAL,S holds
( R is RestFunc-like iff for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) )
let R be Function of REAL,S; :: thesis: ( R is RestFunc-like iff for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) )
A1: dom R = REAL by PARTFUN1:def 2;

A2: now :: thesis: ( R is RestFunc-like & ex r being Real st
( r > 0 & ( for d being Real holds
( not d > 0 or ex z being Real st
( z <> 0 & |.z.| < d & not (|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) ) ) implies for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) )

assume A3: R is RestFunc-like ; :: thesis: ( ex r being Real st
( r > 0 & ( for d being Real holds
( not d > 0 or ex z being Real st
( z <> 0 & |.z.| < d & not (|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) ) ) implies for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) )
assume ex r being Real st
( r > 0 & ( for d being Real holds
( not d > 0 or ex z being Real st
( z <> 0 & |.z.| < d & not (|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) ) ) ; :: thesis: for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) )
then consider r being Real such that
A4: r > 0 and
A5: for d being Real st d > 0 holds
ex z being Real st
( z <> 0 & |.z.| < d & not (|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ;
defpred S₁[ Nat, Real] means ( $2 <> 0 & |.$2.| < 1 / ($1 + 1) & not (|.$2.| ") * ||.(R /. $2).|| < r );
A6: for n being Element of NAT ex z being Element of REAL st S₁[n,z]

proof

let n be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ex z being Element of REAL st S₁[n,z]
set d = 1 / (n + 1);
consider z being Real such that
A7: ( z <> 0 & |.z.| < 1 / (n + 1) & not (|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) by A5;
reconsider z = z as Element of REAL by XREAL_0:def 1;
take z ; :: thesis: S₁[n,z]
thus S₁[n,z] by A7; :: thesis: verum

end;

consider s being Real_Sequence such that
A8: for n being Element of NAT holds S₁[n,s . n] from FUNCT_2:sch 3(A6);
A9: for n being Nat holds S₁[n,s . n]

proof

let n be Nat; :: thesis: S₁[n,s . n]
n in NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence S₁[n,s . n] by A8; :: thesis: verum

end;

A10: now :: thesis: for p being Real st 0 < p holds
ex n being Nat st
for m being Nat st n <= m holds
|.((s . m) - 0).| < p

let p be Real; :: thesis: ( 0 < p implies ex n being Nat st
for m being Nat st n <= m holds
|.((s . m) - 0).| < p )
assume A11: 0 < p ; :: thesis: ex n being Nat st
for m being Nat st n <= m holds
|.((s . m) - 0).| < p
consider n being Nat such that
A12: p " < n by SEQ_4:3;
reconsider q0 = 0 , q1 = 1 as Real ;
(p ") + q0 < n + q1 by A12, XREAL_1:8;
then A13: 1 / (n + 1) < 1 / (p ") by A11, XREAL_1:76;
take n = n; :: thesis: for m being Nat st n <= m holds
|.((s . m) - 0).| < p
let m be Nat; :: thesis: ( n <= m implies |.((s . m) - 0).| < p )
assume n <= m ; :: thesis: |.((s . m) - 0).| < p
then n + 1 <= m + 1 by XREAL_1:6;
then 1 / (m + 1) <= 1 / (n + 1) by XREAL_1:118;
then |.((s . m) - 0).| < 1 / (n + 1) by A9, XXREAL_0:2;
hence |.((s . m) - 0).| < p by A13, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum

end;

then s is convergent by SEQ_2:def 6;
then lim s = 0 by A10, SEQ_2:def 7;
then reconsider s = s as non-zero 0 -convergent Real_Sequence by A10, A9, SEQ_1:5, SEQ_2:def 6, FDIFF_1:def 1;
( (s ") (#) (R /* s) is convergent & lim ((s ") (#) (R /* s)) = 0. S ) by A3, NDIFF_3:def 1;
then consider n0 being Nat such that
A16: for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r by A4, NORMSP_1:def 7;
A17: n0 in NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12;
A19: ||.(((s . n0) ") * (R /. (s . n0))).|| = |.((s . n0) ").| * ||.(R /. (s . n0)).|| by NORMSP_1:def 1
.= (|.(s . n0).| ") * ||.(R /. (s . n0)).|| by COMPLEX1:66 ;
A20: rng s c= dom R by A1;
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . n0) - (0. S)).|| = ||.(((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . n0).|| by RLVECT_1:13
.= ||.(((s ") . n0) * ((R /* s) . n0)).|| by NDIFF_1:def 2
.= ||.(((s . n0) ") * ((R /* s) . n0)).|| by VALUED_1:10
.= ||.(((s . n0) ") * (R /. (s . n0))).|| by A20, FUNCT_2:109, A17 ;
hence for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) by A9, A16, A19; :: thesis: verum

end;

now :: thesis: ( ( for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) ) implies R is RestFunc-like )

assume A21: for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) ; :: thesis: R is RestFunc-like

now :: thesis: for s being non-zero 0 -convergent Real_Sequence holds
( (s ") (#) (R /* s) is convergent & lim ((s ") (#) (R /* s)) = 0. S )

let s be non-zero 0 -convergent Real_Sequence; :: thesis: ( (s ") (#) (R /* s) is convergent & lim ((s ") (#) (R /* s)) = 0. S )
A22: ( s is convergent & lim s = 0 ) ;

A23: now :: thesis: for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex n0 being Nat st
for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r

let r be Real; :: thesis: ( r > 0 implies ex n0 being Nat st
for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r )
assume r > 0 ; :: thesis: ex n0 being Nat st
for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r
then consider d being Real such that
A24: d > 0 and
A25: for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r by A21;
consider n0 being Nat such that
A26: for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
|.((s . m) - 0).| < d by A22, A24, SEQ_2:def 7;
take n0 = n0; :: thesis: for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r
thus for m being Nat st n0 <= m holds
||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r :: thesis: verum

proof

A27: rng s c= dom R by A1;
let m be Nat; :: thesis: ( n0 <= m implies ||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r )
assume n0 <= m ; :: thesis: ||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r
then A28: |.((s . m) - 0).| < d by A26;
A30: m in NAT by ORDINAL1:def 12;
(|.(s . m).| ") * ||.(R /. (s . m)).|| = |.((s . m) ").| * ||.(R /. (s . m)).|| by COMPLEX1:66
.= ||.(((s . m) ") * (R /. (s . m))).|| by NORMSP_1:def 1
.= ||.(((s . m) ") * ((R /* s) . m)).|| by A27, FUNCT_2:109, A30
.= ||.(((s ") . m) * ((R /* s) . m)).|| by VALUED_1:10
.= ||.(((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m).|| by NDIFF_1:def 2
.= ||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| by RLVECT_1:13 ;
hence ||.((((s ") (#) (R /* s)) . m) - (0. S)).|| < r by A25, A28, SEQ_1:5; :: thesis: verum

end;

end;

hence (s ") (#) (R /* s) is convergent by NORMSP_1:def 6; :: thesis: lim ((s ") (#) (R /* s)) = 0. S
hence lim ((s ") (#) (R /* s)) = 0. S by A23, NORMSP_1:def 7; :: thesis: verum

end;

hence R is RestFunc-like by NDIFF_3:def 1; :: thesis: verum

end;

hence ( R is RestFunc-like iff for r being Real st r > 0 holds
ex d being Real st
( d > 0 & ( for z being Real st z <> 0 & |.z.| < d holds
(|.z.| ") * ||.(R /. z).|| < r ) ) ) by A2; :: thesis: verum