let X be set ; for O being Operation of X
for z, s being object holds
( [z,s] in NOT O iff ( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O ) )
let O be Operation of X; for z, s being object holds
( [z,s] in NOT O iff ( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O ) )
let z, s be object ; ( [z,s] in NOT O iff ( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O ) )
thus
( [z,s] in NOT O implies ( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O ) )
( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O implies [z,s] in NOT O )proof
assume A1:
[z,s] in NOT O
;
( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O )
then
(
s in Im (
(NOT O),
z) &
z in X )
by RELAT_1:169, ZFMISC_1:87;
then
(
s in (NOT O) .: {z} &
{z} c= X )
by ZFMISC_1:31;
then
s in union { (IFEQ ((x . O),{},{x},{})) where x is Element of X : x in {z} }
by Def15;
then consider Y being
set such that A2:
(
s in Y &
Y in { (IFEQ ((x . O),{},{x},{})) where x is Element of X : x in {z} } )
by TARSKI:def 4;
consider x being
Element of
X such that A3:
(
Y = IFEQ (
(x . O),
{},
{x},
{}) &
x in {z} )
by A2;
A4:
x = z
by A3, TARSKI:def 1;
A5:
x . O = {}
by A2, A3, FUNCOP_1:def 8;
then
s in {x}
by A2, A3, FUNCOP_1:def 8;
then A6:
(
s = x & ( for
s being
object holds
[x,s] nin O ) )
by A5, RELAT_1:169, TARSKI:def 1;
hence
z = s
by A4;
( z in X & z nin dom O )
thus
z in X
by A1, ZFMISC_1:87;
z nin dom O
(
x in dom O iff ex
y being
object st
[x,y] in O )
by XTUPLE_0:def 12;
hence
z nin dom O
by A4, A6;
verum
end;
assume A7:
( z = s & z in X & z nin dom O )
; [z,s] in NOT O
then reconsider z = z as Element of X ;
z . O c= {}
then
z . O = {}
;
then A8:
IFEQ ((z . O),{},{z},{}) = {z}
by FUNCOP_1:def 8;
A9:
z in {z}
by TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider L = {z} as Subset of X by A7, ZFMISC_1:31;
{z} in { (IFEQ ((x . O),{},{x},{})) where x is Element of X : x in {z} }
by A8, A9;
then
z in union { (IFEQ ((x . O),{},{x},{})) where x is Element of X : x in {z} }
by A9, TARSKI:def 4;
then
z in L | (NOT O)
by Def15;
then
z in z . (NOT O)
;
hence
[z,s] in NOT O
by A7, RELAT_1:169; verum