let X be set ; for f being PartFunc of X,ExtREAL
for S being SigmaField of X
for F being sequence of S
for A being set
for r being Real st ( for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1))))) ) holds
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
let f be PartFunc of X,ExtREAL; for S being SigmaField of X
for F being sequence of S
for A being set
for r being Real st ( for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1))))) ) holds
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
let S be SigmaField of X; for F being sequence of S
for A being set
for r being Real st ( for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1))))) ) holds
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
let F be sequence of S; for A being set
for r being Real st ( for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1))))) ) holds
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
let A be set ; for r being Real st ( for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1))))) ) holds
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
let r be Real; ( ( for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1))))) ) implies A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F) )
assume A1:
for n being Element of NAT holds F . n = A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (n + 1)))))
; A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
for x being object st x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) holds
x in union (rng F)
proof
let x be
object ;
( x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) implies x in union (rng F) )
assume A2:
x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r))
;
x in union (rng F)
then A3:
x in A
by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A4:
x in less_dom (
f,
r)
by A2, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
ex
Y being
set st
(
x in Y &
Y in rng F )
proof
reconsider x =
x as
Element of
X by A2;
A5:
x in dom f
by A4, Def11;
A6:
f . x < r
by A4, Def11;
ex
m being
Element of
NAT st
f . x <= r - (1 / (m + 1))
then consider m being
Element of
NAT such that A9:
f . x <= r - (1 / (m + 1))
;
x in less_eq_dom (
f,
(r - (1 / (m + 1))))
by A5, A9, Def12;
then A10:
x in A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (m + 1)))))
by A3, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
m in NAT
;
then A11:
m in dom F
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
take
F . m
;
( x in F . m & F . m in rng F )
thus
(
x in F . m &
F . m in rng F )
by A1, A10, A11, FUNCT_1:def 3;
verum
end;
hence
x in union (rng F)
by TARSKI:def 4;
verum
end;
then A12:
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) c= union (rng F)
;
for x being object st x in union (rng F) holds
x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r))
proof
let x be
object ;
( x in union (rng F) implies x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) )
assume
x in union (rng F)
;
x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r))
then consider Y being
set such that A13:
x in Y
and A14:
Y in rng F
by TARSKI:def 4;
consider m being
Element of
NAT such that
m in dom F
and A15:
F . m = Y
by A14, PARTFUN1:3;
A16:
x in A /\ (less_eq_dom (f,(r - (1 / (m + 1)))))
by A1, A13, A15;
then A17:
x in A
by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A18:
x in less_eq_dom (
f,
(r - (1 / (m + 1))))
by A16, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A19:
x in dom f
by Def12;
A20:
f . x <= r - (1 / (m + 1))
by A18, Def12;
reconsider x =
x as
Element of
X by A13, A14;
f . x < r
then
x in less_dom (
f,
r)
by A19, Def11;
hence
x in A /\ (less_dom (f,r))
by A17, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
verum
end;
then
union (rng F) c= A /\ (less_dom (f,r))
;
hence
A /\ (less_dom (f,r)) = union (rng F)
by A12, XBOOLE_0:def 10; verum