let n be non zero Nat; :: thesis: for D being n -element FinSequence
for J being closed_interval Subset of REAL
for f being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real:],RNS_Real
for g being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL:],REAL
for G1 being PartFunc of REAL,REAL st ( for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL ) & [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f & f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] & f = g & G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J holds
G1 is continuous

let D be n -element FinSequence; :: thesis: for J being closed_interval Subset of REAL
for f being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real:],RNS_Real
for g being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL:],REAL
for G1 being PartFunc of REAL,REAL st ( for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL ) & [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f & f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] & f = g & G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J holds
G1 is continuous

let J be closed_interval Subset of REAL; :: thesis: for f being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real:],RNS_Real
for g being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL:],REAL
for G1 being PartFunc of REAL,REAL st ( for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL ) & [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f & f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] & f = g & G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J holds
G1 is continuous

let f be PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real:],RNS_Real; :: thesis: for g being PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL:],REAL
for G1 being PartFunc of REAL,REAL st ( for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL ) & [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f & f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] & f = g & G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J holds
G1 is continuous

let g be PartFunc of [:(CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL:],REAL; :: thesis: for G1 being PartFunc of REAL,REAL st ( for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL ) & [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f & f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] & f = g & G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J holds
G1 is continuous

let G1 be PartFunc of REAL,REAL; :: thesis: ( ( for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL ) & [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f & f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] & f = g & G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J implies G1 is continuous )

assume that
A1: for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is closed_interval Subset of REAL and
A2: [:(CarProduct D),J:] = dom f and
A3: f is_continuous_on [:(CarProduct D),J:] and
A4: f = g and
A5: G1 = (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) | J ; :: thesis: G1 is continuous
set I = CarProduct D;
A6: for e being Real st 0 < e holds
ex r being Real st
( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Real st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e ) )
proof
let e be Real; :: thesis: ( 0 < e implies ex r being Real st
( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Real st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e ) ) )

assume 0 < e ; :: thesis: ex r being Real st
( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Real st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e ) )

then consider r being Real such that
A7: ( 0 < r & ( for x1, x2 being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real))
for y1, y2 being Real st [x1,y1] in [:(CarProduct D),J:] & [x2,y2] in [:(CarProduct D),J:] & ||.(x2 - x1).|| < r & |.(y2 - y1).| < r holds
|.((g . [x2,y2]) - (g . [x1,y1])).| < e ) ) by A3, A4, A1, Th37;
take r ; :: thesis: ( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Real st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e ) )

thus 0 < r by A7; :: thesis: for y1, y2 being Real st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e

let y1, y2 be Real; :: thesis: ( |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J implies for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e )

assume A8: ( |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J ) ; :: thesis: for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e

let x be Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)); :: thesis: ( x in CarProduct D implies |.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e )
assume x in CarProduct D ; :: thesis: |.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e
then A9: ( [x,y1] in [:(CarProduct D),J:] & [x,y2] in [:(CarProduct D),J:] ) by A8, ZFMISC_1:87;
x - x = 0. (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) by RLVECT_1:15;
then ||.(x - x).|| < r by A7;
hence |.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e by A7, A8, A9; :: thesis: verum
end;
set Rg = R_EAL g;
A10: dom (R_EAL g) = [:(CarProduct D),J:] by A2, A4, MESFUNC5:def 7;
A11: for e being Real st 0 < e holds
ex r being Real st
( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e ) )
proof
let e be Real; :: thesis: ( 0 < e implies ex r being Real st
( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e ) ) )

assume 0 < e ; :: thesis: ex r being Real st
( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e ) )

then consider r being Real such that
A12: ( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Real st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e ) ) by A6;
take r ; :: thesis: ( 0 < r & ( for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e ) )

thus 0 < r by A12; :: thesis: for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e

let y1, y2 be Element of REAL ; :: thesis: ( |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J implies for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e )

assume A13: ( |.(y2 - y1).| < r & y1 in J & y2 in J ) ; :: thesis: for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e

let x be Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL); :: thesis: ( x in CarProduct D implies |.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e )
assume A14: x in CarProduct D ; :: thesis: |.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e
x is Point of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)) by MEASUR15:42;
then A15: |.((g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1])).| < e by A12, A13, A14;
( (ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x = (R_EAL g) . (x,y1) & (R_EAL g) . (x,y1) = g . [x,y1] & (ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x = (R_EAL g) . (x,y2) & (R_EAL g) . (x,y2) = g . [x,y2] ) by A13, A14, A10, ZFMISC_1:87, MESFUN12:def 4, MESFUNC5:def 7;
then ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) = (g . [x,y2]) - (g . [x,y1]) by Lm2;
hence |.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < e by A15, EXTREAL1:12; :: thesis: verum
end;
set T = Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g));
A16: dom (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) = REAL by FUNCT_2:def 1;
for y0, r being Real st y0 in J & 0 < r holds
ex s being Real st
( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - y0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . y0)).| < r ) )
proof
let yy0, r be Real; :: thesis: ( yy0 in J & 0 < r implies ex s being Real st
( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r ) ) )

assume A17: ( yy0 in J & 0 < r ) ; :: thesis: ex s being Real st
( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r ) )

reconsider y0 = yy0 as Element of REAL by XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider RPg0 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0) as PartFunc of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL by MESFUN16:30;
reconsider Pg0 = RPg0 as PartFunc of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real by MEASUR15:42;
for i being Nat st i in Seg n holds
D . i is Subset of REAL by A1;
then A18: CarProduct D is Subset of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)) by FINSEQ_1:3, Th11;
then A19: dom Pg0 = CarProduct D by A17, A2, A4, MESFUN16:28;
A20: RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) by A1, A19, A2, A3, A4, Th24, Th43;
A21: R_EAL RPg0 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0) by MESFUNC5:def 7;
RPg0 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0) ;
then A22: (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) . y0 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0))) by A1, A17, A2, A3, A4, Th45;
consider r0 being Real, E1 being Element of Prod_Field (L-Field n) such that
A23: ( E1 = CarProduct D & (Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1 = r0 & 0 <= r0 ) by A1, Th52;
per cases ( r0 = 0 or r0 <> 0 ) ;
suppose A24: r0 = 0 ; :: thesis: ex s being Real st
( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r ) )

consider s being Real such that
A25: ( 0 < s & ( for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < s & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < r ) ) by A11, A17;
for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - y0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r
proof
let yy1 be Real; :: thesis: ( yy1 in J & |.(yy1 - y0).| < s implies |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r )
assume A26: ( yy1 in J & |.(yy1 - y0).| < s ) ; :: thesis: |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r
reconsider y1 = yy1 as Element of REAL by XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider RPg1 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1) as PartFunc of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL by MESFUN16:30;
reconsider Pg1 = RPg1 as PartFunc of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real by MEASUR15:42;
A27: dom Pg1 = CarProduct D by A18, A26, A2, A4, MESFUN16:28;
A28: RPg1 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) by A1, A27, A2, A3, A4, Th24, Th43;
A29: R_EAL RPg1 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1) by MESFUNC5:def 7;
RPg1 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1) ;
then (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) . y1 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1))) by A1, A26, A2, A3, A4, Th45;
then A30: ( G1 . yy0 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0) & G1 . yy1 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg1) ) by A21, A29, A5, A17, A22, A26, FUNCT_1:49;
A31: - (G1 . yy0) = - (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0)) by A30, XXREAL_3:def 3;
A32: dom (RPg1 - RPg0) = (CarProduct D) /\ (CarProduct D) by A19, A27, VALUED_1:12;
A33: RPg1 - RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) by A20, A28, MESFUN6C:34;
A34: dom (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) = E1 by A23, A32, MESFUNC5:def 7;
A35: (Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1 < +infty by A23, XREAL_0:def 1, XXREAL_0:9;
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in E1 holds
( - r <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= r )
proof
let x be Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL); :: thesis: ( x in E1 implies ( - r <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= r ) )
assume A36: x in E1 ; :: thesis: ( - r <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= r )
then A37: |.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0)) . x)).| < r by A23, A25, A26, A17;
((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0)) . x) = (RPg1 . x) - (RPg0 . x) by Lm2;
then ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0)) . x) = (RPg1 - RPg0) . x by A23, A32, A36, VALUED_1:13;
then |.((RPg1 - RPg0) . x).| <= r by A37, EXTREAL1:12;
then ( - r <= (RPg1 - RPg0) . x & (RPg1 - RPg0) . x <= r ) by ABSVALUE:5;
hence ( - r <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= r ) by MESFUNC5:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
then ( (- r) * ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1) <= Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) | E1)) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) | E1)) <= r * ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1) ) by A34, A33, A35, MESFUNC7:26;
then A38: ( 0 <= Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0))) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0))) <= 0 ) by A24, A23, A34;
A39: (- 1) (#) RPg0 = - RPg0 by VALUED_1:def 6;
A40: ( (- 1) (#) RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((- 1) (#) RPg0)) = (- 1) * (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0)) ) by A20, MESFUNC6:102;
then A41: ( - RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(- RPg0)) = - (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0)) ) by A39, XXREAL_3:91;
A42: dom (- RPg0) = E1 by A23, A19, A39, VALUED_1:def 5;
A43: RPg1 + (- RPg0) = RPg1 - RPg0 by VALUED_1:def 9;
ex E being Element of Prod_Field (L-Field n) st
( E = (dom RPg1) /\ (dom (- RPg0)) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(RPg1 + (- RPg0))) = (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(RPg1 | E))) + (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((- RPg0) | E))) ) by A28, A40, A39, MESFUNC6:101;
then Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(RPg1 - RPg0)) = (G1 . yy1) + (- (G1 . yy0)) by A23, A27, A42, A43, A30, A31, A41, XXREAL_3:def 2;
hence |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r by A17, A38; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ex s being Real st
( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r ) ) by A25; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose A44: r0 <> 0 ; :: thesis: ex s being Real st
( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r ) )

set r1 = r / 2;
A45: ( 0 < r / 2 & r / 2 < r ) by A17, XREAL_1:215, XREAL_1:216;
then consider s being Real such that
A46: ( 0 < s & ( for y1, y2 being Element of REAL st |.(y2 - y1).| < s & y1 in J & y2 in J holds
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in CarProduct D holds
|.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y2)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x)).| < (r / 2) / r0 ) ) by A11, A23, A44, XREAL_1:139;
take s ; :: thesis: ( 0 < s & ( for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r ) )

thus 0 < s by A46; :: thesis: for y1 being Real st y1 in J & |.(y1 - yy0).| < s holds
|.((G1 . y1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r

let yy1 be Real; :: thesis: ( yy1 in J & |.(yy1 - yy0).| < s implies |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r )
assume A47: ( yy1 in J & |.(yy1 - yy0).| < s ) ; :: thesis: |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r
reconsider y1 = yy1 as Element of REAL by XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider RPg1 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1) as PartFunc of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL)),REAL by MESFUN16:30;
reconsider Pg1 = RPg1 as PartFunc of (CarProduct ((Seg n) --> RNS_Real)),RNS_Real by MEASUR15:42;
A48: dom Pg1 = CarProduct D by A18, A47, A2, A4, MESFUN16:28;
then A49: RPg1 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) by A1, A2, A3, A4, Th24, Th43;
A50: R_EAL RPg1 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1) by MESFUNC5:def 7;
RPg1 = ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1) ;
then (Integral1 ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL g))) . y1 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1))) by A1, A47, A2, A3, A4, Th45;
then A51: ( G1 . yy0 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0) & G1 . yy1 = Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg1) ) by A21, A50, A5, A17, A22, A47, FUNCT_1:49;
A52: - (G1 . yy0) = - (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0)) by A51, XXREAL_3:def 3;
A53: RPg1 - RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) by A20, A49, MESFUN6C:34;
A54: dom (RPg1 - RPg0) = (CarProduct D) /\ (CarProduct D) by A19, A48, VALUED_1:12;
then A55: dom (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) = E1 by A23, MESFUNC5:def 7;
A56: (Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1 < +infty by A23, XREAL_0:def 1, XXREAL_0:9;
for x being Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL) st x in E1 holds
( - ((r / 2) / r0) <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= (r / 2) / r0 )
proof
let x be Element of CarProduct ((Seg n) --> REAL); :: thesis: ( x in E1 implies ( - ((r / 2) / r0) <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= (r / 2) / r0 ) )
assume A57: x in E1 ; :: thesis: ( - ((r / 2) / r0) <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= (r / 2) / r0 )
then A58: |.(((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0)) . x)).| < (r / 2) / r0 by A23, A46, A47, A17;
((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0)) . x) = (RPg1 . x) - (RPg0 . x) by Lm2;
then ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y1)) . x) - ((ProjPMap2 ((R_EAL g),y0)) . x) = (RPg1 - RPg0) . x by A23, A54, A57, VALUED_1:13;
then |.((RPg1 - RPg0) . x).| <= (r / 2) / r0 by A58, EXTREAL1:12;
then ( - ((r / 2) / r0) <= (RPg1 - RPg0) . x & (RPg1 - RPg0) . x <= (r / 2) / r0 ) by ABSVALUE:5;
hence ( - ((r / 2) / r0) <= (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x & (R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) . x <= (r / 2) / r0 ) by MESFUNC5:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A59: ( (- ((r / 2) / r0)) * ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1) <= Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) | E1)) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0)) | E1)) <= ((r / 2) / r0) * ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)) . E1) ) by A55, A53, A56, MESFUNC7:26;
A60: (- ((r / 2) / r0)) * r0 = - (((r / 2) / r0) * r0)
.= - (r / 2) by A44, XCMPLX_1:87 ;
((r / 2) / r0) * r0 = r / 2 by A44, XCMPLX_1:87;
then A61: ( - (r / 2) <= Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0))) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(R_EAL (RPg1 - RPg0))) <= r / 2 ) by A59, A60, A55, A23, XXREAL_3:def 5;
A62: (- 1) (#) RPg0 = - RPg0 by VALUED_1:def 6;
A63: ( (- 1) (#) RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((- 1) (#) RPg0)) = (- 1) * (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0)) ) by A20, MESFUNC6:102;
then A64: ( - RPg0 is_integrable_on Prod_Measure (L-Meas n) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(- RPg0)) = - (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),RPg0)) ) by A62, XXREAL_3:91;
A65: dom (- RPg0) = E1 by A23, A19, A62, VALUED_1:def 5;
A66: RPg1 + (- RPg0) = RPg1 - RPg0 by VALUED_1:def 9;
ex E being Element of Prod_Field (L-Field n) st
( E = (dom RPg1) /\ (dom (- RPg0)) & Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(RPg1 + (- RPg0))) = (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(RPg1 | E))) + (Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),((- RPg0) | E))) ) by A49, A63, A62, MESFUNC6:101;
then Integral ((Prod_Measure (L-Meas n)),(RPg1 - RPg0)) = (G1 . yy1) + (- (G1 . yy0)) by A23, A48, A65, A66, A51, A52, A64, XXREAL_3:def 2;
then |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| <= r / 2 by A61, ABSVALUE:5;
hence |.((G1 . yy1) - (G1 . yy0)).| < r by XXREAL_0:2, A45; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
then G1 | J is continuous by A5, A16, FCONT_1:14;
hence G1 is continuous by A5; :: thesis: verum