let n be Nat; for M1, M2 being Matrix of n,REAL st M1 is Nonpositive holds
M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M2
let M1, M2 be Matrix of n,REAL; ( M1 is Nonpositive implies M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M2 )
A1:
( Indices M1 = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):] & Indices (M1 + M2) = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):] )
by MATRIX_0:24;
assume A2:
M1 is Nonpositive
; M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M2
for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices (M1 + M2) holds
(M1 + M2) * (i,j) <= M2 * (i,j)
proof
let i,
j be
Nat;
( [i,j] in Indices (M1 + M2) implies (M1 + M2) * (i,j) <= M2 * (i,j) )
assume A3:
[i,j] in Indices (M1 + M2)
;
(M1 + M2) * (i,j) <= M2 * (i,j)
then
M1 * (
i,
j)
<= 0
by A2, A1;
then
(M1 * (i,j)) + (M2 * (i,j)) <= M2 * (
i,
j)
by XREAL_1:32;
hence
(M1 + M2) * (
i,
j)
<= M2 * (
i,
j)
by A1, A3, MATRIXR1:25;
verum
end;
hence
M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M2
; verum