let n be Nat; for M1, M2 being Matrix of n,REAL st M1 is_less_or_equal_with - M2 holds
M2 is_less_or_equal_with - M1
let M1, M2 be Matrix of n,REAL; ( M1 is_less_or_equal_with - M2 implies M2 is_less_or_equal_with - M1 )
A1:
( Indices M1 = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):] & Indices M2 = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):] )
by MATRIX_0:24;
assume A2:
M1 is_less_or_equal_with - M2
; M2 is_less_or_equal_with - M1
for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices M2 holds
M2 * (i,j) <= (- M1) * (i,j)
proof
let i,
j be
Nat;
( [i,j] in Indices M2 implies M2 * (i,j) <= (- M1) * (i,j) )
assume A3:
[i,j] in Indices M2
;
M2 * (i,j) <= (- M1) * (i,j)
then
M1 * (
i,
j)
<= (- M2) * (
i,
j)
by A2, A1;
then
M1 * (
i,
j)
<= - (M2 * (i,j))
by A3, Th2;
then
M2 * (
i,
j)
<= - (M1 * (i,j))
by XREAL_1:25;
hence
M2 * (
i,
j)
<= (- M1) * (
i,
j)
by A1, A3, Th2;
verum
end;
hence
M2 is_less_or_equal_with - M1
; verum