let n be Nat; for M1, M2, M3, M4 being Matrix of n,REAL st M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M3 + M4 holds
M1 - M3 is_less_or_equal_with M4 - M2
let M1, M2, M3, M4 be Matrix of n,REAL; ( M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M3 + M4 implies M1 - M3 is_less_or_equal_with M4 - M2 )
assume A1:
M1 + M2 is_less_or_equal_with M3 + M4
; M1 - M3 is_less_or_equal_with M4 - M2
A2:
Indices M1 = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):]
by MATRIX_0:24;
A3:
width M2 = width M4
by Lm3;
A4:
Indices (M1 + M2) = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):]
by MATRIX_0:24;
A5:
( Indices M4 = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):] & len M2 = len M4 )
by Lm3, MATRIX_0:24;
A6:
Indices M3 = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):]
by MATRIX_0:24;
A7:
Indices (M1 - M3) = [:(Seg n),(Seg n):]
by MATRIX_0:24;
A8:
( len M1 = len M3 & width M1 = width M3 )
by Lm3;
for i, j being Nat st [i,j] in Indices (M1 - M3) holds
(M1 - M3) * (i,j) <= (M4 - M2) * (i,j)
proof
let i,
j be
Nat;
( [i,j] in Indices (M1 - M3) implies (M1 - M3) * (i,j) <= (M4 - M2) * (i,j) )
assume A9:
[i,j] in Indices (M1 - M3)
;
(M1 - M3) * (i,j) <= (M4 - M2) * (i,j)
then
(M1 + M2) * (
i,
j)
<= (M3 + M4) * (
i,
j)
by A1, A4, A7;
then
(M1 * (i,j)) + (M2 * (i,j)) <= (M3 + M4) * (
i,
j)
by A2, A7, A9, MATRIXR1:25;
then
(M1 * (i,j)) + (M2 * (i,j)) <= (M3 * (i,j)) + (M4 * (i,j))
by A6, A7, A9, MATRIXR1:25;
then
(M1 * (i,j)) - (M3 * (i,j)) <= (M4 * (i,j)) - (M2 * (i,j))
by XREAL_1:21;
then
(M1 - M3) * (
i,
j)
<= (M4 * (i,j)) - (M2 * (i,j))
by A2, A7, A8, A9, Th3;
hence
(M1 - M3) * (
i,
j)
<= (M4 - M2) * (
i,
j)
by A7, A5, A3, A9, Th3;
verum
end;
hence
M1 - M3 is_less_or_equal_with M4 - M2
; verum